This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Originally posted here

Sometimes it feels like conversations about the Gulf of Mexico -- nearly three years after BP's Deepwater Horizon catastrophe unleashed roughly 5 million barrels of fresh crude -- take place in parallel universes.  Inside a courtroom here in New Orleans, BP and its high-priced lawyers continue to push for lower estimate of how much oil was spilled, while their unending barrage of uptempo TV ads seeks to convince Americans that the environmental disaster is ancient history.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The reality is completely different. Environmentalist and pilot Bonny Schumaker, of On Wings Of Care, took to the skies over the Gulf yet again this weekend and produces sad and stunning photo documentation of a natural treasure that remains under assault from crude oil pollution, both at and near the Deepwater Horizon site, near another industrial oil spill, as well as unexplained seepage of fresh crude. The ongoing damage to this vital natural resource continues to threaten not only low-lying wetlands but key wildlife sanctuaries and marine habitats.

Here's how Bonny Schumaker describes what she's seeing, both now and over the last three years:

A few weeks ago, our flight over the Gulf showed little of the usual ugly sheen we had been seeing off the southeast coast of Louisiana for the past six months, so we voiced cautious but hopeful optimism. (See "Clearer views and good news for the Gulf?") But today's flight gave us anything but optimism.  We saw pervasive rainbow and gray sheen in many places, including the two chronic pollution sites that have plagued the Gulf for years now -- the Taylor Energy site about 12 nautical miles (nm) off the southern tip of Louisiana, and the Macondo prospect another 50 nm offshore (home to the infamous lease block MC252 and the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe of 2010 April). We have flown more than 500 flight hours in the past three years over these offshore and coastal waters, and the two trends that disturb us most are 1) sources of "unknown sheen" are constant and uniquitous, and 2) the presence of visible marine life has dropped drastically.   After today's flight, we filed 15 NRC reports with the US Coast Guard for significant oil slicks or sheens over our 350-nm route.

Here is some of the background. It was the On Wings of Care flights over the Gulf that has documented a series of alarming oil sheens in the Macondo oil field, which is where the Deepwater Horizon was located. The first major discovery was in the summer of 2011, or roughly a year after the oil leak, which prompted an investigation and a raft of denials from BP. In November of last year, the oil was back -- and this time BP, confronted by indisputable evidence, tried to blame the problems on a small leak from a containment dome. The Coast Guard, thanks to pressure from officials like Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey, continues to look more closely at the real cause of the problem. We've long been concerned that pressure from the drilling in the unstable Macondo area may have caused cracks in the sea floor.

I would urge you to read all of Bonnie's whole flyover report. It coves a lot of territory in the Gulf, including another oil rig spill -- the Taylor Energy site. which is much closer to the Louisiana coastline than the BP site -- as well as other apparent oil slicks or pollution of unknown origins.

However, the ongoing situation at the Macondo field remains particularly vexing, as she reports:

As we flew southward from MC252, we found the ENSCO DS-3 drillship still where it has been for the past several months, and a few miles beyond that BP's MC474A "Nakiki" production platform.  This platform was flaring, as usual, with dirty smoke rising high into the air. There was light surface sheen for miles and miles to the north and east of Nakiki, and scattered rainbow patches in the sheen to its north.  We also noted several other significant-looking areas of surface sheen between here and about 10 nm northwest of MC252, making a total of three more NRC pollution reports beginning with the sheen at MC252.

This is more remarkable -- albeit somewhat depressing -- work from On Wings of Care. In the big picture, it continues to puncture the myth that Big Oil is capable of drilling safely in the Gulf, especially in a complex formation like the Macondo Field. On a more down-to-earth level, it gives me one final chance tourge readers to nominate On Wings of Care for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Guardian of the Gulf Award -- it is a couple of minutes well spent. (The form is here.)

To read the On Wings of Care flight report from March 8 (last Friday), please check out: http://onwingsofcare.org/...

My March 8 post urging support for OWOC to win a "Guardian of the Gulf" award is here: http://www.stuarthsmith.com/...

The actual nomination form is here: http://www.stuarthsmith.com/...

Read my Aug. 17 , 2011 post that broke the story of the “new Macondo leak”: http://www.stuarthsmith.com/...

To check out my post from November 2011 about leaks at the Macondo field, go to: http://www.stuarthsmith.com/...

Here is our report from Oct. 3 of last year about another fresh oil sheen in the Gulf: http://www.stuarthsmith.com/...

To read Bonny Schumaker’s report of a Dec. 2, flyover please go to: http://www.onwingsofcare.org/...

For more information about BP’s ongoing misinformation about leaks at the Macondo sire, please read: http://www.rightinginjustice.com/...

© Smith Stag, LLC 2013 – All Rights Reserved

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Stuart H Smith on Tue Mar 12, 2013 at 07:04 AM PDT.

Also republished by Gulf Watchers Group.

Your Email has been sent.