This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Warren Emerging

Another hearing of the Senate Banking Committee, another few minutes of powerful outrage from my Senator, Elizabeth Warren.

As Joan previewed yesterday, today's hearing (which just wrapped up) included debate on the nomination of Richard Cordray to be the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). His nomination has been held up by historic levels of Republican obstruction. Needless to say, Senator Warren, who helped to found and stand up the Bureau, is reaching the end of her rope with these delays.

And I can't be the only person who, when I read her questions from today's hearing, heard echoes of the great Howard Dean...


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Senator Warren began by noting that she had no questions for Cordray since he had testified over a dozen times before the Senate and has been deemed to be more than qualified for the post and has been seen as an exemplary interim head of the Bureau.

She then proceeded to filet her Republican Senate colleagues with a series of very pointed "questions" in which she argued that the CFPB is being singled out for not so special treatment, unlike other federal agencies:

"What I want to know is why, since the 1800s, have there been agencies all over Washington with a single director, including the [Office of the Comptroller of the Currency]," she began, "but unlike the consumer agency, no one in the U.S. Senate has held up confirmation of their directors demanding that the agency be redesigned."

"What I want to know," she continued, "is why every banking regulator since the Civil War has been funded outside the appropriations process -- but unlike the consumer agency, no one in the U.S. Senate has held up confirmation of their directors demanding that that agency or those agencies be redesigned."

"And what I want to know is why there are agencies all over Washington whose rules are final subject to ordinary reviews and oversight, while the CFPB is the only agency in government subject to a veto by other agencies -- but unlike the CFPB, no one in the U.S. Senate holds up confirmation of their directors demanding that those agencies be redesigned."

Updated: Senator Warren's question time during today's hearing:

And for those who, like me, had a deja vu moment reading Senator Warren's comments, join me on a walk down memory lane -- to Sacramento in March 2003 -- ten years ago almost exactly -- for the "What I Want to Know" speech that launched Howard Dean's presidential campaign:

The obstruction and undermining of the CFPB is seriously outrageous. Senator Warren's response seems entirely appropriate to me. Here's hoping that her pointed "questions" get under her colleagues' skin and shame them into confirming Richard Cordray as the new head of the CFPB.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.