This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

The US District Court of Northern California has ruled that the some of the FBI's use of national security letters (NSLs) is unconstitutional.  These NSLs are issued without judicial review to force telecommunications companies to turn over users' records while prohibiting the providers from even revealing that the letters have been issued.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

As the ruling by US District Judge Susan Illston states, in a previous case courts found NSLs to generally be constitutionally acceptable but allowed their use with compelled non-disclosure only if: 1) the FBI certifies that disclosure might result in a known (enumerated) harm to a terrorism investigation; 2) that a court can modify the standard non-disclosure order unless disclosure is reasonably likely to harm an investigation; and 3) that the FBI has the burden of proof to satisfy the first two criteria.

In its usual lawyerly manner - thus reinforcing my opinion of Eric Holders' status as the worst attorney general since Alexander Palmer - the government argued that 1) the court lacked jurisdiction; 2) but even if the court had jurisdiction, the FBI is following the court's restrictions (requiring the court to take its word for that).  The current court rejected the administration's arguments, finding that the government had not shown that it is generally necessary to prevent telecommunications concerns from publishing even the fact that they received a NSL.

Certainly, the issue here seems to be narrow - only whether the telecommunications providers can publicly acknowledge the bare fact that they've received a letter, without giving any details.  However, I would expect that the government will appeal the court's finding as it has in all similar judicial setbacks.  I also hope that the Electronic Frontier Foundation can continue its fight against the unrelenting erosion of civil liberties protections which has occurred in the past twelve years.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.