This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

You may have heard that Congress passed an appropriations bill today to keep the government running through the end of September.

You probably haven't heard that the GOP successfully attached an amendment to the must-pass bill to continue their long-running war on information. What are they protecting the American people from this time? Political Science.

Follow me below


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The GOP has been trying to kill the National Science Foundation's Political Science program for several years. While they were unable to completely end the program, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) successfully attached an amendment to the appropriations bill to severely limit the subjects eligible for research funding.

The provision included in the final legislation reads:

To prohibit the use of funds to carry out the functions of the Political Science Program in the Division of Social and Economic Sciences of the Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences of the National Science Foundation, except for research projects that the Director of the National Science Foundation certifies as promoting national security or the economic interests of the United States.
So what kind of information did the GOP decide the American people could do without?
Senator Coburn: "Studies of presidential executive power and Americans' attitudes toward the Senate filibuster hold little promise to save an American's life from a threatening condition or to advance America's competitiveness in the world."
OK then. "We don't need no stinkin' information about the (deteriorating) state of American democracy."

While this may not seem like a huge deal in and of itself, it sets a terrible precedent.

As the American Political Science Association notes:

Adoption of this amendment is a gross intrusion into the widely-respected, independent scholarly agenda setting process at NSF that has supported our world-class national science enterprise for over sixty years.

The amendment creates an exceptionally dangerous slippery slope.  While political science research is most immediately affected, at risk is any and all research in any and all disciplines funded by the NSF.  The amendment makes all scientific research vulnerable to the whims of political pressure.

Moreover, its part of a much broader pattern.

When the GOP didn't care for the information on science and technology coming out of the congressional support agency known as the Office of Technology Assessment, New Gingrich killed the agency.

In an effort to head off any sort of gun control efforts, the GOP forbid the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from carrying out any research of gun-related violence.

Last fall, when the Congressional Research Service issued a report on tax rates the GOP found inconvenient, Senate Republicans exerted pressure on the agency to have it pulled.

Access to high-quality information is absolutely essential for what President Obama called the "hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government." Apparently, its also incompatible with the Republican project.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.