You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
In the early hours of Saturday morning, the Senate passed their $3.7 trillion budget, 50-49. Four Democrats, Sens. Mark Pryor (D-AR), Kay Hagan (D-NC), Max Baucus (D-MT) and Mark Begich (D-AK), all up for reelection in 2014, voted against it.
The marathon vote took 13 hours, ending at about 5:00 AM Saturday morning. More than 500 amendments were filed (you can see the crazy list here), but there ended up being just 70 votes on 101 amendments—many were combined and voted on en bloc by voice vote to try to speed the process up.
The budget had been a key demand of House Republicans for agreeing to a three-month delay in raising the debt ceiling. The budget itself is non-binding and since the spending levels for government agencies was already set by the Budget Control Act debt-ceiling deal, it was mostly a political statement. But after months and months of demands from Republicans for a Senate budget, what was their reaction?
When Rep. Paul Ryan, the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, saw the document, he said, “Their budget never balances—ever. It simply takes more from hardworking families to spend more in Washington. It ignores the drivers of our debt. It continues the raid on Medicare. And it imperils the health and retirement security our seniors need.”
When the budget passed, Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said, “The Democratic Caucus has produced a budget here that won’t work. It does not meet the challenge of our time.”
Note that the Ryan budget contains that same "raid on Medicare" that Ryan included in his previous budget, and that he ran against at the top of GOP's 2012 ticket. Not that you could expect an honest response from Republicans to this budget, but Ryan's response is still pretty remarkable given his budgetary flim-flam. With this part of the debt-ceiling agreement completed, the rest of the wrangling over the sequester and the debt-ceiling hike can continue. After a nice, two-week holiday recess.
10:53 AM PT: For some perspective, and an indication of the Republican gamesmanship on this, throwing every possible political insanity (U.S. out of the UN? Rand Paul had it. Abortion? David Vitter was on it) into the mix.
The term “vote-orama” officially entered the Senate lexicon in 1977, according to the Senate historian’s office. By 2009, it had become ridiculous enough to prompt a hearing to demand changes. At that time, Democratic and Republican Budget Committee leaders lamented a process that had gone off the rails. In 2006, senators submitted 87 amendments. In 2007, there were 91, in 2008, 113.
This year, there were more than 500.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 08:33 AM PDT.