This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

A very simple argument.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The divide between leftists and conservatives comes down to an irreconcilable disagreement about the meaning of fairness with respect to the distribution of resources. Both camps basically agree that resources are fairly distributed when they are distributed in a manner such as that resources are allocated to where they are best utilized. For leftists, this means resources are most fairly distributed when they are distributed to those who need them the most--the bottom tier. For conservatives, this means resources are most fairly distributed when they are distributed to those who deserve them the most--the top tier.

This disagreement is irreconcilable because one position is neither commensurable with nor reducible to the other. This will inevitably lead to conflict, and the responsible choice for a person rightly belonging to either camp is to try to cause their side to be victorious in this conflict because this result will lead to what they believe to be a just and fair distribution of societal resources. All the rest is strategy and war. Please note that this does not necessarily mean violent confrontation. It merely means a conflict over who gets to legitimately use the engines of state to distribute resources in some particular way, and prevailing in violent confrontation is not a necessary condition for earning legitimacy in this sense when one lives in a society with predominantly civilized people. This conflict could be nothing more than trying to mean the public argument by rational appeal.

The problem with liberals is that they are not acting responsibly. Each person who is not suffering from a political schizoid syndrome is either a leftist or a conservative (though I suppose someone could truly be a centrist if they believe resources are fairly distributed by the Gaussian distribution). Postmodern liberals’ commitment is to conflict avoidance and creating an environment of freedom from harassment is perfectly suited for mastering identity politics for political advantage. This is a pragmatic position, because we live in a political milieu in which negotiated settlements to distributional conflicts are structurally imposed—i.e. some form of parliamentary democracy. So, an inclination toward deal making and giving up on one’s position to some degree in order to avoid conflict and reach agreement is rational within this framework.

But pragmatism aside, it is still irresponsible to avoid conflict when it involves sacrificing deeply held values about the nature of justice and fairness. Liberals like Clinton and Obama have shown that they are not committed to prevailing over rightists in the fundamental conflict over how resources are fairly distributed. And over the course of their tenures as president, they have presided over the continued concentration of wealth and privilege at the top of the income distribution, a predictable outcome in the face of a determined and highly organized cohort of rightists who are still authentically committed to their position. Liberals are not leftists, they are conservative enablers.

Postmodern liberalism has as its goal freedom from harassment. But not all forms of harassment; freedom from harassment of a particular kind. Postmodern liberalism has the tenous position, quite hard to balance, that sociological propositions for the broad categorization of groups of people are legitimate for the construction of both personal narratives and meta-narratives, but illegitimate for the construction of criticisms. So, people, as they are resting in the breast of these sociological propositions, should not be harassed by pejorative labels. The use of labels for the construction of a personal identity is fine, and this identity should rightfully be validated in this view. But harassment is out of the question, and outsiders, especially disinterested patrician reformers, need to be careful about how these demographic categorizations are used because any insensitivity could be a sign of insouciance and harassment. Data about people which uses these sociological categorizations as data labels is perfectly alright to mine by outsiders for the interpretation of patterns of public opinion, however. This makes for a great identity politician, but not for a goal-directed moral opponent of the concentration of material resources.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Nathan Jaco on Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 08:22 PM PDT.

Also republished by Trolls.

Your Email has been sent.