This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Sen. Sherrod Brown
Sherrod Brown: not the financial industry's favorite candidate
 to chair the Senate Banking Committee come 2015.
Seung Min Kim and Kate Davidson put on their speculators' caps at Politico Wednesday to assess the impact that Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio would have if he wound up in the chairman's seat of the Senate Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Committee in 2015 since the current chairman, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, is leaving the Senate after next year. Not surprisingly, a lot of bankers don't like the idea because, in the words of the writers, Brown is big on "bashing" big banks.  

It's certainly true that Brown would be tougher on big banks than the financial industry is used to. And the one-two punch of Brown and freshman Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts could turn the committee into far more of an activist watchdog than it's been in decades. Brown already has made it clear that banks "too big too fail" are banks too big, period:

“It’s not just that they are too big to fail,” the senator says. “They really are too big to understand and too big to manage. They are certainly too big to regulate. And they have only gotten bigger since the financial crisis.” The concentration of banking power in a few big-name firms was already dangerous. Now it is even more dangerous.

Senator Brown explains, “The four largest behemoths, now ranging from $1.4 trillion to $2.3 trillion in assets, are the result of thirty-seven banks merging thirty-three times. In 1995, the six biggest US banks had assets equal to 18 percent of GDP. Today, they are about 63 percent of GDP.”

Brown and Republican Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana have worked together on requiring higher capital requirements for banks, and the Senate just passed the Brown-Vitter budget amendment that ends government hand-outs to banks with assets of more than $500 billion. Please continue reading below the fold about Brown's chances for the Senate Banking Committee chairmanship.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

No wonder then that Brown is not on the top of the list of favorites for the banking post, although some think his negative reputation within the financial industry is distorted:

"It would be a monumental shift in terms of both tone and substance from the [Chris] Dodd and Johnson chairmanships,” Isaac Boltansky, an analyst at Compass Point Research & Trading, told Politico. “I think everything from too-big-to-fail banks all the way down to issues impacting the unbanked and underbanked would suddenly see a new energy behind them." [...]

“I think that unfortunately too many people try and promote … kind of a caricature of Sherrod Brown as a fire-breathing liberal,” said Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, a group that advocates for tight oversight of Wall Street. “But I think anybody who’s worked with him knows and understands that he’s a pretty thoughtful, open guy.”

Those assessments aside, there are a few obstacles to leap over before Brown could even get the job. With Johnson gone, he would be fourth in line of seniority.

Ahead of him is Jack Reed of Rhode Island. But since Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin of Michigan is also retiring, that's where Reed would presumably prefer to land. Next down the list is Chuck Schumer of New York. He is seen as the most likely candidate for the post, especially given how much of the financial industry is based in his state. If Majority Leader Harry Reid were to retire from that post, Schumer might go for it, but there's no reason to believe Reid is pondering any such move.

If Schumer didn’t take the banking chairmanship, the third in line is Robert Menendez of New Jersey. But he is already chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, a post he would be unlikely to give up.

But before any of this can happen, the Democrats have to hang onto the Senate. And 2014 will be a tough year with 21 seats held by Democrats in the running and only 14 held by Republicans. Five Democratic retirements have already been announced. Besides Johnson and Levin, Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, Tom Harkin of Iowa and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia are all out.

If the Democrats don't win, the next chairman of the Senate Banking Committee would likely be ranking member Mike Crapo, the Republican from Idaho.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM PDT.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.