This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Warning -  Funny Palin (who?) diary, turn away now if you've had your fill.

So I was minding my own business last night when an amusing tweet was bought to my attention...

Nathan Wurzel is a Republican consultant and fundraiser.

Nathan Wurtzel  @NathanWurtzel  

I disagree with a very large portion of Avlon's writings. I know he's anti-Palin no matter what. But today's article is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.

12:05 AM - 30 Mar 13

Cannot embed these tweets because it is a protected account, but if you want to verify fill your boots.

The Avlon writing he was agreeing with was entitled "SarahPAC Embarrassment

For a look see at the inevitable outcome pop over the Koscurl*


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Obviously getting a little stick here

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
But I can't make you believe things you don't want to believe.

Couple of tweets giving facts.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
FEC reports (tons of data here): http://images.nictusa.com/...

Getting fed up now

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
Can't wait to be told I don't understand campaign/PAC spending or the FEC. Go ahead and try it.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
Of course. Because I pointed out she's abusing her supporters. RT @antonettegreen1: @NathanWurtzel but you are anti-palin too

Tries sympathy

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
It's always the ones you root for the hardest who disappoint you the most.


Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
If you care about the conservative movement, you don't fleece its supporters and you don't stand by and let it happen when you see it.

Starting to get a little pissed

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
@antonettegreen1 I'm not going to debate a Palin cultist because there is zero chance I will change your mind. Waste of my time.

More defence

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
@JazzShaw Do you think I'd put my ass out there on something like this if it wasn't so outrageous?

Hmmm, interesting, a retweet of a Breitbarter

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  16h  
As have I RT @RBPundit: I’m a little bummed because I defended Palin so many times

His timeline is a hoot, eg

RB ‏@RBPundit  15h  
I didn’t think it was possible, but there people more unhinged than Ronulans -> @PalinArmy

Back to Nathan who is now getting decidedly ratty

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
@CoolChange80 Shut up, asshole. There is NO EXCUSE for ripping off conservative donors like that.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
@gary4205 And I could care less what you think if you're too stupid to understand she's ripping her donors off

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
@gary4205 Do you understand how stupid you sound? You don't care about the facts, you worship a politician.

ROFL, this guy is growing on me

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
@gary4205 Seriously, you sound like a Stalin-era zampolit. It's pathetic.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
@gary4205 There are shady consultants who spent your money on a nice new boat laughing at your gullible ass right now.

Uh Oh, Gary is angry

Gary Jackson ‏@gary4205  14h  
@CoolChange80 Yup @NathanWurtzel is a nasty little toad A hater of the highest order & a bullshit artist deluxe  Needs run out of politics

Nathan after many to ings and fro ings is bored.....me too Nathan,me too

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
OK, @gary4205, I am bored with you now. But do tell me when you're going to run me out of politics.

There are so many wormholes that I went down in Nathan's timeline that it is almost impossible to quote them all. He had a convo with a big noise from The Right Scoop, he was abused by Palinbots, he lost his temper and found his humour and lost his temper again. He had quite a night.

I'll post a couple more and maybe some links. I had a lot of fun watching some folks finally catch on to Griftzilla.


Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  14h  
At least the last person who tried to run me out of politics used complete sentences.
Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h

Tonight I learned a Sarah Palin endorsement SINGLEHANDEDLY wins a race so it's OK if her PAC has 94% overhead because RINO.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
See, Rand Paul won because of Palin's endorsement and her $7,000 and not because of the millions Paul raised plus the millions Rove spent.

Sarcasm, heh

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
That $7,000 was SUPERMONEY that overwhelmed all the other money.

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
@godsowncrunk You cannot tell people you are using their money to advance conservatism, spend 94% on overhead, and be honest.
Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h

@godsowncrunk 6% of the money her PAC raises goes to voter contact. 94% goes to overhead and consultants. Can I make this clearer?

Clear as a bell to me Nathe (can I call you Nathe?), not so to some others

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
If you don't understand why it's not OK for 94% of the money you raise to go to overhead, I can't possibly explain it to you.

Oh Nathe, give up hon

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
At that point you are worshipping a person and will not listen to any reason and my life is just tick tick ticking away here, you know?

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
@TNBeanCounter Show me how her writing an endorsement on stationary vs. wasting $5 million on overhead would have produced different result

Oh no, I don't agree with this one Nathe, I kinda like this bit

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
@godsowncrunk It's not a SuperPAC. I am upset because she is wasting the money of conservative donors.

Back to snark

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  13h  
Hey, good news, everyone: Just get a Sarah Palin endorsement and you AUTOMATICALLY WIN.

Michael Blum ‏@MichaelBlum3  13h  
@NathanWurtzel Just think if she'd only put 91% towards overhead.  We'd probably have taken over Canadian gov't by now too.

Ralph gets an earful after a long back and forth

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  11h  
@Ralph7509 So here it is: You're a boor and a bore and you give conservatism a bad name. And this is our last communication.

Ha, Rubio comes into the convo with the RightScoop guy

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  10h  
@trscoop I wasn't aware of the Rubio thing and I am really disappointed. That kind of misspending doesn't happen with our clients.

First sign of Nathan today, he's still battling the bots bless his little heart

Nathan Wurtzel ‏@NathanWurtzel  4h  
Not yet RT @JohnEkdahl Has anyone seen @NathanWurtzel since last night? I'm starting to worry that maybe he was thrown out of politics.

Okay, this is way too long a dairy already, just a couple of links to screengrabs of some of the conversations Nathan was suffering at the hand of the Palin Peeps



UPDATE: WOW! This is going to sting Griftzilla...


There’s a sucker born every minute. For those, there’s a fresh new site for SARAH PAC donations. Enjoy. The rest of us, however, say: “Bye-bye, Sarah.”
*Koscurl - There was a little url who had a little curl, right in the middle of all diaried, and when it was good it was very, very good, but when was bad it was horrid.
Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.