This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

It looks like the talking points that go out through the gundamentalist community across the US, get spread by groups like Ammoland.com that maintain blogs,  correspondents and lobbying efforts.  They stoke each other up and develop framing for arguments.  

The opposition to any gun regulation that has developed is due to the people who push the various talking points that are getting out there, which then turn into lots of emails and calls into Congressional offices.  Ammoland seems to be a window on this world, and may be a prime source of this psychology.  

Best to know what the messages that are going out against gun safety regulation are. I recommend subscribing to this newsletter:



You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

In the current issues we see that the targets are legislators in Colorado and Connecticut where elected leaders are insanely laughing as they put the Constitution into the shredder, if you accept the Ammoland way of looking at it.

Judging from the blog posts, a lot of people do and they don't necessarily bother to critique the logic of the reasoning involved.  The more full of factual errors and full of holes and swiss cheese-like it is, the better.  Foaming at the mouth intensity trumps responsible efforts to face reality as it is.  

In reading this, and scanning through the news of what has been going on lately, I wonder if we are looking at a very dark movement in American culture that does not just involve suburbanites who like to collect finely crafted specimen weapons.  

Are James Holmes or Jared Loughner just simply representatives of a world inside their own heads or did they get their ideas about conflict resolution and how to see issues in society such as interdependence vs individual hegemony from within a culture we should be more concerned about? Perhaps that is what this gun regulation debate is revealing.  

The Aryan brotherhood types are bound to be expressing their muscle bound thinking in this mix and it would seem that they basically want no laws at all.  They are not in favor of law enforcement and when they talk about less government, they mean fewer cops that might get too interested in what they might be doing.  

This bears a real serious look and for this reason, I recommend really watching the content that comes across on this and other websites and newsletters.  

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Stuart Heady on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 11:19 AM PDT.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA) and Shut Down the NRA.

Your Email has been sent.