This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

In case you missed Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley's article about what he's done to reduce gun violence in Maryland, I've excerpted and linked it below and suggest taking the time to read the entire piece.

Why? Because O'Malley avoids the typical trap that many people writing about gun violence or advocating for gun violence fall into - accepting the gun lobby's frame of "rights being infringed."

Instead O'Malley focuses on saving lives and the consequence of failing to do so. He takes a "problem solving" approach to gun violence and focuses on concrete actions that can lead to concrete results.

More discussion below the squiggely diggely.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

What O'Malley has done is to write about gun violence in a entirely different context than the typical gun violence debate:

Between 1999 and 2009, the people of Baltimore achieved the greatest reduction in crime of America's largest cities. Statewide in Maryland, we have driven violent crime and homicide down to three decade lows. There are 426 more people alive today in our state, because of the actions we have chosen to take together.

This is important, life-saving progress, but there is more that we can and must do. Lives are at stake.

Yesterday, our State Legislature passed common sense gun safety reforms. Strategies that work. Strategies which have been endorsed by Chiefs of Police, hunters, clergy, parents, advocates for public health, advocates for victims of domestic violence, citizens from all walks of life.

That frame instantly creates a sense of urgency and a powerful legitimacy to act. Anyone arguing against this frame is in the position of defending why they would not want to save lives. This frame puts the gun violence prevention advocates on offense and the pro gun supporters on defense.

The typical response from pro gun advocates is "more laws won't save any lives." And that's where gun violence advocates want the debate to be — what can be done to save lives: "yes, these laws can reduce gun violences" versus "no these laws won't do anything."

The argument that more laws won't accomplish this goal is untenable and can be easily defeated with data and examples of states with strong gun laws versus those without. The idea of rights being infringed is gone and not part of this discussion.

Beyond the logic of this frame, on a gut level it is also a winning argument - don't you want to try everything possible to save lives?

All of us have a role to play in transforming these instances of unspeakable loss and tragedy into action that saves lives.

While we may differ on which specific reforms are the best way forward, surely we can all agree that there are ways to protect the lives of brave police officers without infringing on the traditions of hunters; and that there is more we can do to improve mental health treatment and data sharing; and that investing to upgrade school security is common sense.

I suggest reading the entire article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to We Shall Overcome on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:35 AM PDT.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA) and Shut Down the NRA.

Your Email has been sent.