This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

That's the basic headline:  Democrats hide when asked about ending high-income loophole to ensure Social Security's future.

The group Remapping Debate has an article up talking about eliminating the income cap on the payroll tax for Social Security.  We all know that that is the best way to ensure the continued solvency of the program.  And the group went to find out where that idea stood:

Nevertheless, these routes to ensuring the promises made to workers that they could rely Social Security benefits are kept is little discussed on Capitol Hill. And even though the national Democratic Party has presented itself as the defender of Social Security, Remapping Debate discovered a profound unwillingness among most Democratic senators to identify their position on the issue.
Some of the names you'll expect, some will surprise you.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Currently there are three legislative proposals in the Senate regarding the income cap:

Senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska) proposed a bill in February (re-introduced from December 2012) that would phase out the payroll tax cap, as did Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) in March. Sen. Begich’s bill is co-sponsored by Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), while Sen. Harkin’s bill has no co-sponsors.

Also last month, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) proposed a bill to apply the payroll tax to income above $250,000.The legislation was patterned after a proposal President Obama made during his 2008 presidential campaign to lift the cap for income above $250,000 (and is consistent with the President’s 2008 pledge not to raise taxes on households with income less than $250,000).  

This bill is co-sponsored by Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).

So, from March 19 to 29, Remapping Debate canvassed the remaining Senators that had not signed on as cosponsors of any of this legislation.

Some responses:

Senator Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.) told Remapping Debate that “I am in favor of using the changing of the cap to help deal with the long-term solvency of Social Security; I think it’s a fair way to do it.”

 The office of Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) also indicated in an email that the Senator has supported the idea that those with income above $250,000 pay into the system through the payroll tax.  

The office of Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) provided a statement that “Sen. Brown is strongly opposed to handing Social Security over to Wall Street or raising the retirement age or cutting benefit levels for seniors who have contributed to Social Security throughout their working years."   “Instead,” the statement continued, “he believes that we can improve the solvency of Social Security by asking the wealthiest Americans to contribute to the program the same share of their income as the middle class.”

Mark Warner's (D-VA) office sent a video in which he confirms he is for raising the cap and a phased in increase in the retirement age.

An aide to Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) wrote that Kaine is “open” to raising the cap.

 Senator Frank Lautenberg’s (D-N.J.) office stated by email that Lautenberg is “considering” the “removal of the payroll tax exclusion for the highest-income earners.”

Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) in an email restated her opposition to raising the retirement age or reducing cost of living adjustments to benefits, but did not answer the question on the cap.  However, she was a cosponsor of Senator Sanders' bill to do just that in 2011.  BUT, she did not sign as a cosponsor in 2013.  She was asked if she changed her mind.  They received no answer.

Four Senators expressly declined to comment through their press offices to answer their questions on the payroll cap:

Chris Coons (D-DE)
Mark Udall (D-CO)
Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

Other Senators indicated through their offices they were "too busy", some seemed initially responsive but then gave a "thanks anyway", and still others gave no response.

This is the problem.  No one wants to talk about the real solutions.  Sure, in the House you have the Progressive Caucus, but they're dismissed because they will eventually go along with Leader Pelosi.

And look at Elizabeth Warren.  She should be in the lead on this issue.  But she's behind a wall of silence, not commenting on this.

We got a statement today against Chained CPI, but there has been nothing about lifting the income cap.  

And until these real solutions actually start getting talked about seriously in the media, this is all we're going to get.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to zenbassoon on Wed Apr 10, 2013 at 10:31 AM PDT.

Also republished by Pushing back at the Grand Bargain and Social Security Defenders.

Your Email has been sent.