This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I wrote a letter to Senator Richard Durbin's office asking him to oppose the President's "Compromise" budget and its use of the chained CPI to cut social security and increase taxes on the lower income workers.  In my letter, I questioned the chained CPI proponents' premise that the use of the current CPI-U overstates inflation, pointing out that my mom is currently in Alzheimer's care and receiving social security, and that over the past three years, while the cost of her care has increased from $3,800 to $5,600 monthly, her social security has only increased by $68, and that in her case it was not possible to "substitute" some commodity the price of which is decreasing for professional Alzheimer's care.

Predictably, I received a form letter from the senator's office, featuring a lot of words implying that the senator was undecided on whether to support the President's approach.  One paragraph piqued my interest though:

The CPI tends to overstate inflation due in part to substitution bias.  Given the widespread use of the CPI, especially when it comes to adjusting payments to inflation, its accuracy can have a significant impact on the economy.  Currently, the CPI is a fixed-weight price index and does not always accurately predict the impact of the price increase on a consumer's budget.  Some deficit reduction plans have called for a shift to a chained-CPI calculation to produce a measure of change in consumer prices that is free of substitution bias.
I called the senator's office to question this paragraph, and was referred to a staff member named Beth Cook.  After several attempts, I was able to reach Beth, and it became very clear from the conversation that the senator is "all in" on the chained CPI.  When I pointed out that it was inappropriate to refer to changes in Social Security in the context of "deficit reduction plans", Beth responded that the Senator "believes that all options need to be on the table."  I followed that cutting social security was not an option which would in any way impact the deficit, Beth responded that it was "necessary to sometimes introduce other policy issues to get people to talk about deficit reduction."

The conversation quickly devolved from there, with Beth continuously spewing infuriating talking points about the "inflated" and "inaccurate" CPI, the "impossibility" of a revenue-based solution to Social Security's long-term challenges, the "need to support the President's grand bargain, and even some nonsense about the senator "investigating the alternative of tax-favored savings plans to offset losses from the 'unsustainable' traditional social security program."  

While Beth continued to insist that the senator is "undecided", it was clear from the talking points that Senator Durbin's mind is made up and that he is fully behind cutting social security and increasing taxes on the poor and middle class.  Because "accuracy", you know.  I ended the conversation sick to my stomach that I voted for Senator Durbin and the President.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to WaltIN on Sun Apr 14, 2013 at 09:28 AM PDT.

Also republished by Land of Lincoln Kos.

Your Email has been sent.