This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Obama's plan for universal pre-K has gotten fairly positive treatment among liberal journalists--one of the positives to counter-balance the negative coverage of his attack on the landmarks of the American welfare state.  

One of my main questions after hearing about the proposal for universal pre-K several months ago was how it would be funded, especially as the President promised it would be "deficit-neutral."  Our education funding is greatly inequitable, as can be demonstrated in my home metro area of Philadelphia.  Suburban schools have much higher spending per student than do urban schools, a result of the reliance on property taxes as a funding base among other reasons.  For children in their formative years, the imperative to have ample and equitable funding for educational resources is even stronger.

The President's budget describes the funding mechanism for universal pre-K in the following manner:


 o    The Preschool for All initiative is financed by raising the Federal tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products, which would also have substantial public health impacts, particularly by reducing youth smoking
I love sin taxes.  I love soda taxes, cigarette taxes, and alcohol taxes, and I'd probably create some new ones if I could.  But this is a bad use of sin tax revenue.  You raise taxes on cigarettes because they are damaging to personal and public health and because society incurs a cost (in increased health expenditures in Medicare and Medicaid, for instance) as a result of such individual decisions.  A "sin tax," consequently, is a form of Pigovian tax, a tax on a market activity that produces negative externalities, and it is designed to decrease the frequency of the activity in question.  Likewise, the revenue from such a tax can be used to address the problem as well.  Tax revenue from tobacco consumption can be used to fund public health programs and initiatives, working to mitigate the effects of smoking and curb current and future smoking rates through non-economic means.  Soda taxes, likewise, can contribute to the funding of nutrition programs.

In classical economics, a Pigovian tax just helps to reach the "market equilibrium" of an externality-producing activity.  However, I would never argue for the existence for a "market equilibrium" of tobacco consumption just as I wouldn't for pollution.  Government agencies such as the FDA and the NIH want the smoking rate to trend down as it has done for the past few decades.  As the attached link shows, the smoking rate almost halved from the early 1980s to the present.  As the consumption rate continues to fall, the revenue from tobacco taxation would fall as well.   If the revenue gained were allotted to public health (as noted above), when consumption falls, the need for the corresponding preventive and corrective programs would fall as well.

According to the White House's funding mechanism for pre-K, however, the more people that smoke, the more money we have for pre-K, and a decrease in tobacco consumption actually threatens the viability of the program.  That, from a public health perspective, is simply perverse.  If the President wants to go back to old habits, he can do so if he chooses, but he can't say it's "for the children."


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

8:36 PM PT: I just noticed that Melissa Harris-Perry discussed this issue on her show earlier today.  If you want to watch, check it out here: http://www.nbcnews.com/....

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Liberty Equality Fraternity and Trees on Sun Apr 14, 2013 at 02:01 PM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.