OK

This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.

ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.

  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Definitely not the most important thing going on this AM.  If there are any Duke alums out there, you can help sort this out. Duke is not the NRA.

Intro

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

While researching a draft reply to a WAPO thread on the oft-quoted Quinnipiac poll on background checks, (http://www.quinnipiac.edu/...) I came across a ref for "Duke.edu"  entitled TEN MYTHS ABOUT GUN CONTROL - Duke University.

Putting aside, for the moment, the bizarre incongruity of the articles title and its purported source...I was looking for factual data on the topic and Duke seemed a credible source for information.    Oh, so wrong!!

The entire "article" was a screed of twisted information attributed to fringe groups, clubs and "professional" organizations.  There, at the bottom of the article's last page,  was the only myth that mattered.

"Copyright October 1994, NRA Institute for Legislative Action. This is the electronic version of the "10 Myths of Gun Control" brochure distributed by NRA. To obtain paper copies of this brochure, please call NRA Grassroots at 800/392-8683."

The entire thing was an NRA screed.  This variation on the False Flag tactic, combined with "push polls", is yet another ooze of pollution poisoning the publics reservoir of factual information. It won't stand.

I tried to email  Duke, but are actually being cyber-attacked this am, phishing, and their emails are down. So,  I left a tel msg for their "brand manager" and used a different email conduit to contact their school of journalism as well.

So, if there are interested Alums out there, don't let this "false flag" remain planted.

My email to Duke:

The NRA appears to be falsely claiming Duke Univ is the author of "Ten Myths About Control", which is, in fact, a screed written by the NRA.  This web address improperly uses "duke.edu" in a transparent attempt to obtain credibility by misusing the highly regarded reputation of Duke .

http://people.duke.edu/...

This matter came to my attention while researching a gun regulation debate, specifically the Quinnipiac poll  on support of background checks.

I sincerely hope Duke takes steps necessary to rebuff this clumsy and ineffective attempt to trade on Duke's good name.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to lenomdeplume on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM PDT.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA) and Shut Down the NRA.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.