This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Conventional wisdom would suggest that Mark Sanford's effort to retake his congressional seat should have ended with Wednesday's revelation that he'd been caught trespassing on his ex-wife Jenny's property on numerous occasions.  And yet, multiple pundits have suggested that he could still win.

For instance, U.S. News and World Report interviewed a longtime watcher of the South Carolina scene who thinks Elizabeth Colbert-Busch is still the underdog in this race.

"If you put a gun on me, I would say still as a Republican he's got to be the favorite," says David Woodard, a South Carolina political consultant and visiting professor at Southern Methodist University. "He wasn't depending on their money that much to begin with; he can get plenty of support."
But Woodard does say the decision by the National Republican Congressional Committee, made in the wake of public revelations Sanford would be appearing in court two days after the May 7 election on allegations he repeatedly trespassed on the property of his ex-wife, is just one of many factors piling up on Sanford.

"It's sort of dying by a 1,000 cuts. Every time you get a new news story, it's bad," he says. "It seems pretty incomprehensible in my saner moments that a Republican could lose that seat, especially somebody who used to hold it, but I can begin to see a scenario where that could happen."

Let's make no mistake about it--SC-01 has a serious Republican edge to it, at R+11.  But consider that we're talking about a guy who, according to Jenny Sanford's compliant, has flouted the requirement that he get permission to come to her house on multiple occasions--to the point that she had to file a "no trespassing" letter.  And even if you believe Sanford's account that he only violated that provision once, he did so in an absolutely creepy way--sneaking into the house through the back door, using his cell phone as a flashlight.  How in the world is that not too much even for an R+11 district?

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The Daily Beast's John Avlon, whose parents live in Charleston, thinks that while many of the district's voters may be disgusted with Sanford, they may still hold their noses and vote for him in May.

South Carolinians have largely made up their minds about Sanford’s serious moral failing and the statewide embarrassment it created. There’s no doubt that he will have a hard time winning the women’s vote—and that could make all the difference in this election. But an equally large consideration for locals will be whether they want to give Nancy Pelosi an additional vote in the House.
So if Avlon is to be believed, there are voters in SC-01 who would rather have a borderline stalker represent them than a librul any day.  If that's the case, we REALLY need to get politicians out of the redistricting business.  After all, there's something fundamentally wrong if it's even remotely possible for Sanford to still win with all that's come out this week.

It's all the more reason why Elizabeth Colbert-Busch needs our help.  Send her some love at her donation page or at ActBlue.

7:25 AM PT: Adam B mentions a potentially huge development in this race in the comments:

If PPP says Colbert-Busch is leading, then Colbert-Busch is leading.  Looks like the thousand cuts may be starting to bleed.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.