This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Folks: if you don’t have much time, please go immediately to http://350.org and comment on the KXL pipeline. If you have a bit of time, consider checking out the deeply absurd report.

My comment to the State Department:

I am writing to comment on the Keystone XL pipeline Draft SEIS. Many individuals and organizations have noted serious flaws in the report, for example

Having read the report directly, I wish to add a major concern about the document’s shocking lack of internal consistency. From

page 4.14-3 (bottom) to 4.14.-4 (top), the report states “this analysis has taken a precautionary approach by using the worst-case projections (A2 scenario) to ensure potential impacts and outcomes are not underestimated.” The context of this statement is apparently to demonstrate that even if the A2 emissions scenario comes true (and it is arguable that A2 is no longer the worst case), the pipeline itself can handle changes in temperature and precipitation. Therefore, rhetorically, to make the case for the pipeline more convincing, you grant up to 4.6 degrees Fahrenheit Average Temperature change in the Dry Temperature and Prairie Climate regions (Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska) by 2040-2059, but state the pipeline (pipe, supports, method of burial) itself can survive! This gives me (continued after the squiggly...)


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

small comfort, given that if anything approximating that temperature rise occurs, the impact on geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, terrestrial vegetation, wildlife, fisheries, threatened and endangered species, land use, socioeconomics, cultural resources, AND air quality (sections 4.1-4.12) is likely to be horrible, yet you do not reflect this in those sections of your report. I agree that the pipeline itself is not the only source of the A2 scenario, but it is literally part of the problem.

To paraphrase liberally, it appears that you are saying: “don’t worry – a well-built, well-covered steel pipeline can handle worst-case changes in temperature and precipitation … however, in other parts of our analysis, we’ll won’t play out this worst case.” This does not meet basic standards of internal consistency. I expect Secretary of State Kerry and President Obama to base their decisions on well-written summaries of complex social technical issues. At the least, Volume II, especially sections 4.1-4.16 and 5.3, must be completely revised.

Or, rather than revising the report and stretching out this process further, how about showing some vision, leadership, and insight. How about drawing a line in the tar sands with an honest conclusion: this pipeline is a 50-year commitment to a means of energy production that is leading to disruptive climate change. It is NOT in the best interests of the United States.

Extended (Optional)


The Keystone XL Pipeline fight is a good place to draw a line on disruptive climate change.

77%14 votes
5%1 votes
0%0 votes
5%1 votes
11%2 votes

| 18 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.