This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

This diary is partly a response to Stephen Wolf's amazing diary about nonpartisan redistricting. As you may recall, in the comments section of that diary he and I discussed several ways in which the nonpartisan maps of some states might be improved. In the end, most of my concerns boiled down to three states: Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. In this diary, therefore, I will discuss my proposals for nonpartisan, communities-of-interest-based maps in those three states. I will also explain how I drew some of the maps, so that you can see the thought processes that I used in order to draw the maps.

UPDATE: Connecticut is added!

Without further ado, follow me over the fold for the details.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).


Map of the whole state:

Map of the Boston area:
District 1:
Demographics: 90/2/5/2 (White/Black/Hispanic/Asian)
2008: 64-34 Obama
The 1st district combines many areas, including the rural, liberal Berkshires, the Northampton/Amherst area, and northern Worcester County. What these areas all have in common is that they are substantially more rural and less densely populated than the rest of Massachusetts. In a district of 726,000 people, the largest city is Pittsfield (pop. 44,737). This area has little in common with either Springfield or Worcester, so it definitely deserves its own district. SAFE D.

District 2:
Demographics: 73/7/16/3
2008: 62-36 Obama
The 2nd district contains Springfield and most of its suburbs, and then goes east to include southwest Worcester County and the city of Worcester. This district is more an urban and suburban district, with only a few rural areas between the two cities. The suburbs in this district are whiter and less affluent than suburbs in other districts. It’s not a problem that the towns around Worcester are split three ways, because the Worcester suburbs have never been as big or important to the city as the Springfield suburbs. SAFE D.

District 3:
Demographics: 79/2/12/6
2008: 57-42 Obama
The 3rd district takes in the entire Merrimack Valley, which is a distinct community of interest. To pick up enough population, it also picks up Gloucester and inland Essex County. This area is also not particularly wealthy. SAFE D with Tsongas.

District 4:
Demographics: 76/5/12/6
2008: 60-39 Obama
This district takes in two distinct communities of interest: the less affluent coastal towns (Salem, Lynn, etc.) and the middle-class, less liberal towns north of Boston. After drawing the 3rd, this district was a no-brainer, and it worked out quite well that those two communities of interest took up exactly one district. SAFE D, even with Tierney.

District 5:
Demographics: 86/2/4/6
2008: 59-39 Obama
This district takes in a wide swath of Boston’s outer suburbs. Much of this area (though not all) is quite wealthy, and has a larger Asian population than areas to its west and north. This district is united by its population density, which is roughly even throughout, as well as its status as outer suburbs. SAFE D.

District 6:
Demographics: 74/5/6/12
2008: 76/23 Obama
This district takes in all the inner suburbs to the north and west of Boston that are inside I-95 (aka Route 128). This is a very cohesive, extremely liberal district that has a very large number of colleges and universities. The split of Boston that I have makes sense because the parts of Boston in this district are either suburban in nature (such as Allston/Brighton) or rich, liberal, and college-y (Back Bay, Beacon Hill). The Boston Marathon explosions actually happened on the border of this district and the 7th, because the border is Boylston Street. SAFE D.

District 7:
Demographics: 55/20/12/9
2008: 71-28 Obama
This district takes in some of the grittier areas of Boston, as well as some of its less affluent southern suburbs. Some of these suburbs, such as Quincy, Braintree, and Randolph, actually swung toward Obama last year. These southern suburbs were definitely the best ones to attach to this part of Boston. SAFE D.

District 8:
Demographics: 88/3/4/2
2008: 59-40 Obama
This district includes the entirety of Bristol County (which, unlike some other MA counties, is a community of interest). It also takes in some adjoining areas of Norfolk County, and one town of Plymouth (which acts as a suburb of New Bedford). This is a nice, cohesive district, and I don’t have much more to say about it. SAFE D.

District 9:
Demographics: 88/5/3/1
2008: 55-44 Obama
This district is basically Plymouth County plus the Cape and Islands. Some of you may wonder why I put Brockton in this district when it would seem to go better in the 7th. The reason is that moving Brockton to the 7th would involve shifting Braintree, Weymouth, and Hingham to the 9th. This would split the solid community of interest that is Quincy, Braintree, and Weymouth. Also, the district would look rather ugly (in my opinion). Thus, I kept Brockton with the rest of Plymouth County. LIKELY D.

This map would really mess up the incumbents. Neal and McGovern would be put together (though one might carpetbag over to the 1st). Tsongas, Capuano, Lynch, and Keating all have clear districts. Markey and Tierney are put together, but since Markey is running for the Senate that won’t be a problem. Finally, Joe Kennedy would probably take the Bristol County-based district. Overall: 8 Safe D, 1 Likely D

New Jersey

Map of the whole state:

South Jersey:
In South Jersey, I put Cape May, Cumberland, Atlantic, and Salem in the same district, and then split Gloucester. I then kept Camden whole and added a few parts of Burlington there. Then, I combined Mercer with the rest of Burlington (except for a few small townships). Ocean County is kept whole, and some of southern Monmouth is added to it.

District 1 (blue): 70/13/12/4 (white/black/Hispanic/Asian), 55-44 Obama '08
District 2 (green): 70/14/10/5, 64-35 Obama
District 3 (purple): 64/18/10/6, 63-36 Obama
District 4 (red): 87/3/7/2, 58-41 McCain

Middle Jersey:

The rest of Monmouth is put with east Middlesex, and the remainder of Middlesex is combined with southern Somerset.

District 5 (gold): 75/7/9/8, 50-49 Obama
District 6 (teal): 48/11/18/22, 63-36 Obama

North Jersey:

The black-majority and Hispanic-majority districts look like they do on almost any other map. However, the drawing of those two districts resulted in the necessity of drawing the 9th, which is the least cohesive district on this map. I wanted the 10th to be more working-class and the 11th to be wealthy, so this district was necessary even though it takes in rich areas, poor areas, white areas, and minority areas. The district is really a nice microcosm of the state as a whole. And of course, the 12th is an outer-suburban and rural district.

On this map, districts 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 would be safe Democratic, and districts 4, 11, and 12 would be safe Republican. Frank LoBiondo would have a slightly more Democratic district to deal with, and Frank Pallone would have a swing district in Monmouth and Middlesex Counties. However, Jon Runyan would be a goner (Rush Holt would defeat him), and districts 6 and 9 would be open for a Democrat. Andrews, Payne, Sires, and Pascrell have clear districts. Smith would probably carpetbag over to the 4th. Garrett and Frelinghuysen are put together in the 12th, but one of them might move over to the 11th. Finally, Leonard Lance is left without a district.

District 7 (gray): 24/51/17/6, 84-15 Obama
District 8 (slate blue): 31/8/48/10, 72-27 Obama
District 9 (cyan): 62/7/22/7, 56-44 Obama
District 10 (pink): 47/11/27/13, 64-35 Obama
District 11 (light green): 80/2/7/10, 54-45 McCain
District 12 (light blue): 83/2/8/5, 57-42 McCain

Overall, 7 Democratic/3 Republican/2 Swing.


Map of the whole state:

Southwest Pennsylvania:
With regards to Pittsburgh, I feel that there should be an urban Pittsburgh district, and then a suburban district all around it. Then there should also be a Demosaur district around there, and then the Erie-Lawrence-Beaver district. The rest of western PA is pretty self-explanatory.

Mike Doyle’s seat is safe, however Murphy and Rothfus both live in the 3rd (though Rothfus might carpetbag over to the 2nd). Kelly no longer lives in his district (which is now a swing district), though he could move from the 4th to the 5th, which would leave the 4th open. Shuster and Thompson are both safe.

District 1 (blue): 76/18/2/3 (white/black/Hispanic/Asian), 67-32 Obama '08
District 2 (green): 95/3/1/1, 53-46 McCain
District 3 (purple): 94/2/1/2, 57-42 McCain
District 4 (red): 92/5/2/1, 52-46 Obama
District 5 (gold): 96/2/1/1, 57-42 McCain
District 6 (teal): 94/2/1/2, 53-45 McCain
District 7 (gray): 95/2/2/1, 64-35 McCain

Southeast Pennsylvania:

Here is my proposal for SEPA. Bucks is kept whole, two district are entirely in Philadelphia, there’s a Montco-based district, Delaware is kept whole, and Reading goes with Lancaster. This allows for a moderate-outer-suburbs district containing parts of Chester, Montgomery, and Berks. I figured that this is the least CoI-ignoring of all the SEPA possibilities. I restored Tim Holden’s old district, and kept Lehigh and Northampton together and NEPA together as well. The only problem is that Monroe is split into three pieces, but that was inevitable since the rest of those districts all look nice.

Perry is safe, but Cartwright and Barletta are put together in a matchup that Cartwright would win. Holden would be safe in his new district if he chose to run for it. Although Pitts lives in Chester County, he’s always been seen as Lancaster’s congressman, and if he chose to run in the 13th he’d be pretty safe. Charlie Dent would face some challenges in the 10th, since it is now slightly more Democratic. Gerlach would cruise in the 12th, as that district is perfect for him. Fitzpatrick would also easily win the 14th. The big loser in SEPA is Pat Meehan, who now gets all of Delaware County and a district that voted 59-40 for Obama in 2008. Brady, Fattah, and Schwartz’s successor would all be safe in their districts.

District 8 (slate blue): 89/4/4/2, 56-43 McCain
District 9 (cyan): 89/4/5/1, 56-43 Obama
District 10 (pink): 79/5/12/3, 57-42 Obama
District 11 (light green): 85/8/5/2, 50-49 McCain
District 12 (light blue): 88/5/5/2, 52-47 Obama
District 13 (tan): 82/4/12/2, 51-48 McCain
District 14 (olive): 88/4/4/4, 54-45 Obama
District 15 (orange): 76/15/3/5, 59-40 Obama
District 16 (lime green): 19/70/4/5, 95-5 Obama
District 17 (dark blue): 56/16/18/8, 74-26 Obama
District 18 (yellow): 79/9/4/7, 61-38 Obama

Overall: 5 Safe D, 1 Likely D (Meehan), 1 Likely Holden, 2 Tossup (4th, 10th), 2 Likely R (2nd, 14th), 7 Safe R

UPDATE: Connecticut is added!


Connecticut's map doesn't change a whole lot from the current map, but the changes are not positive for Democrats. A nonpartisan map would put New Britain with Hartford, leaving Esty's seat less Democratic at only 54% Obama in 2008. Esty is also drawn out of her district here, since her hometown of Cheshire is put in DeLauro's district. However, there are still many Democrats who could run here, but under a nonpartisan map this district would be a tossup. The other four districts are all safe for their incumbents.

I hope you enjoyed reading this diary, and any thoughts, concerns, questions, or comments are much appreciated. I must thank Stephen Wolf for his incredible diary that really gave me a lot to think about and was the impetus for writing this diary. I am only standing on the shoulders of giants here.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to ProudNewEnglander on Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 08:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by DKos Pennsylvania.


Which of these maps is the best, from a nonpartisan, CoI standpoint?

43%16 votes
21%8 votes
35%13 votes

| 37 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.