This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Last night, Stephen Colbert laid waste to the now-debunked Reinhart-Rogoff paper that claimed countries with a debt-to-GDP ratio of greater than 90% would lead to calamity was actually based on both an Excel spreadsheet error, as well as removing countries from the dataset that didn't fit into their preconceived notions.  Stephen actually had on Thomas Herndon, the grad student who found the crucial mistake.

And just look at the Poindexter who caught the mistakes — Thomas Herndon, who reviewed their data and immediately spotted a basic spreadsheet error and that they had "excluded data from Canada, New Zealand, and Australia — all countries that experienced solid growth during periods of high debt and would thus undercut their their thesis".

Oh please.  If ignoring New Zealand, Australia, and Canada were a crime, everyone in America would be on death row.  (high fives arm under his desk, wild audience laughter and applause)

Now sure, Herndon's corrected spreadsheet show that countries with debt over 90% did not see their economies shrink -0.1%, but instead saw them grow 2.2%.

But c'mon.  2.2% up, 0.1% down; you say potato, I say eliminate food stamps.  And for Pete's sake, how were Ren and Stimpy supposed to know that their paper — which has brought austerity to millions — was flawed?  It wasn't peer-reviewed.  (audience groans in disgust)

So, no one needs to fact-check them.  It's not like they said they were watching Scooby Doo when they were 4.

Now after publication in 2010, one economist complained that they refused to share their data.  Well, of course they didn't share their data.  If they can't use Excel, I doubt they could send an e-mail attachment.  (audience laughter)

But folks, Siegfried and Roy are standing by their results, saying:

CARMEN REINHART & KENNETH ROGOFF (4/16/2013): The weight of the evidence to date — including this latest comment [by Herndon] seems entirely consistent with our original interpretation of the data.
Right!  Entirely consistent with their interpretation, because no matter how much the results change, the hypothesis must remain the same.  That's science!

Well folks, now that I know academic papers don't have to be all mathy to make a global impact, I got some of my own completely unsupported findings I would like to drop.

For instance:

Hydrofracking Makes Your Ass Look Better in Jeans

Crude Oil: Nature's Egret Moisturizer

And Holster V. Bra: How Gun Control Causes Manboobs

(wild audience cheering and applause)

And, unlike Banger and Mash, my studies are peer-reviewed, in that I showed them to some seagulls on a pier.

And I can say with absolute certainty, that I did not make a single error in my Excel spreadsheet, because for these studies, I used Angry Birds: Star Wars.  Bottom line, Bartels & James' study is still valid, no matter what some punk UMass Amherst econ grad student named Thomas Herndon says.  And when we return, I'll be joined by punk-ass Amherst econ grad student Thomas Herndon.  We'll be right back.

Video below the fold.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Stephen also noted that Chris Christie couldn't have been telling the truth about... Scooby Doo.
Meanwhile, Jon also laid waste to Congress for weakening the insider trading law put in place by last year's STOCK Act.
John Oliver then had the second part of his report about gun laws in Australia, and the politicians it affected.
Stephen talked with Google's Eric Schmidt, and Jon had on Salman Rushdie.
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to BruinKid on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 05:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Electronic America: Progressives Film, music & Arts Group.

Your Email has been sent.