This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

It needs to be debated.

To me there are a lot of ambiguities, perhaps because I am not very ethically sophisticated.

Arguments can be made that drones "save" lives (American lives). American military personnel.

Some may argue that drones save civilian lives. I don't know what proof exists for that.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The troubling ethics:

Drone kills are clean (those doing the kills do not get blood on themselves, disregard what actually happens on the ground, there's a lot of blood), drone kills displace the killer in the same way that a gun does. Pull a trigger in either case and you can kill someone at a distance.

Unmanned weapons. Weapons that direct themselves at heat, heat emanating from something living -- without thought or consideration.

Robotic warfare.

Tracy McVeigh (ironic name) holds forth in the Guardian:

Killer robots must be stopped, say campaigners
'Autonomous weapons', which could be ready within a decade, pose grave risk to international law, claim activists

A new global campaign to persuade nations to ban "killer robots" before they reach the production stage is to be launched in the UK by a group of academics, pressure groups and Nobel peace prize laureates.

Robot warfare and autonomous weapons, the next step from unmanned drones, are already being worked on by scientists and will be available within the decade, said Dr Noel Sharkey, a leading robotics and artificial intelligence expert and professor at Sheffield University. He believes that development of the weapons is taking place in an effectively unregulated environment, with little attention being paid to moral implications and international law.

The Stop the Killer Robots campaign will be launched in April at the House of Commons and includes many of the groups that successfully campaigned to have international action taken against cluster bombs and landmines. They hope to get a similar global treaty against autonomous weapons.

Simply put, robotic warfare is immoral.

But then, warfare is immoral, though some may quibble about Bellum iustum, which I sardonically believe was ginned up to justify the Crusades, but then I am sometimes cynical and snarky and sneering about these religious convictions.

Robotic warfare is just another step beyond regular warfare. Or, a slippery slope, another cliche, a slope made slippery by the blood of many innocents, "collateral damage," the coy phrase the military industrial complex likes to use to trivialize these deaths of innocents, that which is incidental to the main objective, death and destruction ... of the so-called enemy.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.