This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Yesterday, the New York Times and CBS News released a poll on domestic policy to complement their recent one on foreign policy, on which I’ve written a diary.  I wanted to look at the demographic divides behind the recent poll data.  Most of it aligns with expectations, but some demographic gaps I found to be genuinely surprising.

It is probably common knowledge that there is a gender gap on gun control with women favoring it much more strongly than men.  Nevertheless, it is interesting to see how large that gap is.


In general, do you think gun control laws should be made more strict, less strict, or kept as they are now?
54% more strict
•    43% of men vs. 64% of women
•    81% of Democrats vs. 35% of Republicans vs. 49% of Independents
•    52% no college vs. 60% college
•    48% of 30-44 year-old’s vs. 65% of 65+

10% less strict
•    15% of men vs. 5% of women
•    5% of Democrats vs. 13% of Republicans vs. 11% of Independents
•    12% of 18-29 and 13% of 30-44 vs. 4% of 65+

33% kept as they are
•    39% of men vs. 28% of women
•    51% of Republicans vs. 14% of Democrats vs. 37% of Independents

A plurality of all groups except for Republicans wanted gun control laws to be stricter.  

Do you favor or oppose a nationwide ban on semi-automatic weapons — including some rifles, pistols, and shotguns that have detachable magazines, allowing them to rapidly fire a high number of rounds?
50% favor ban
•    41% of men vs. 58% of women
•    41% of Republicans vs. 65% of Democrats vs. 46% of Independents
•    46% no college vs. 59% college
•    46% 18-44 vs. 57% 65+

47% oppose ban
•    56% of men vs. 38% of women
•    56% of Republicans vs. 32% of Democrats vs. 52% of Independents
•    51% no college vs. 37% college

Groups that favor the ban (plurality/majority): Women, Democrats, College graduates, 45+

Groups that oppose ban (plurality/majority): Men, Republicans & Independents, No college, <45

In other words, our gun control supporters are more likely to be older, college-educated Democratic, and female, and the strongest gun control opponents are more likely younger, not-college-educated, Republican, and male.  Surprise!

I found it interesting, though, how Independents were much closer to Republicans than they were to Democrats.  I've read articles before about how many former Republicans are now labeling themselves as Independents because of the tarnished party brand, which could offer an explanation.

Do you favor or oppose a federal law requiring background checks on all potential gun buyers?
87% Favor vs. 11% oppose

All demographics favor with over 83% majority, with the aforementioned demographic and political divides still holding.


If you HAD to choose ONE, which of the following domestic programs would you be willing to reduce in order to cut government spending ?
I think this question is interesting in that it reveals people's priorities, but I think it creates the false impression of a zero-sum game in which we MUST cut something.

Education: 7%

Only among seniors (65+) did the percentage choosing education cuts extend into double digits, 12%.

Roads, Bridges, & Other Infrastructure: 29%

36% of women vs. 22% of men
40% of Democrats vs. 28% of Independents vs. 20% of Republicans
33% of 30-44 year-olds vs. 21% of seniors
34% of those with incomes <$50K vs. 21% of those with incomes >$50K

Science & Medical Research: 16%

There was relative agreement here with %'s ranging from a low of 11% among Republicans to a high of 19% among 30-44 year-olds.  Surprisingly, Democrats (18%) chose this more than Republicans did although that is less surprising when you look at the next category.

Aid to the unemployed and poor: 29%

22% of Women vs. 35% of Men
17% of Democrats vs. 28% of Independents vs. 44% of Republicans
42% of 18-29 year-olds vs. 21% of seniors
21% of those with incomes < $50K vs. 44% of those with incomes > $50K

Pluralities of women (36%), Democrats (40%), 30-44 year-olds (33%), 45-64 year-olds (29%), those without college degrees (31%), and those with incomes < $50 K (34%) chose roads, bridges, & infrastructure as their budgetary sacrifice.

Pluralities of men (35%), Republicans, (44%), 18-29 year-olds (42%), college graduates (31%), and those with incomes > $100K (44%) chose aid to the unemployed and the poor as their budgetary sacrifice.

A plurality of seniors (33%) couldn't decide and chose "don't know/no answer."

The largest items in the federal budget are Medicare, the government health insurance program for seniors, Social Security and the military. If you HAD to choose ONE, which of the following programs would you be willing to change in order to cut government spending?
Again, this creates a false zero-sum game but has value in revealing policy priorities.

Pluralities of all groups except for Republicans chose to cut the military.  The percentage of Republicans who chose military cuts (31%) just edge out the percentage that wanted Medicare cuts (30%).

43% said cut the MILITARY budget
        58% of Democrats vs. 42% of Independents vs. 30% of Republicans
        48% of college graduates vs. 41% of non-graduates
        37% of 18-29 year-old's vs. 47% of 65+ year-old's
        45% of those with incomes < $100 K vs. 39% of those with incomes > $100K

23% said cut MEDICARE
         14% of Democrats vs. 23% of Independents vs. 31% of Republicans
         25% of 18-29 year-old's and 28% of 30-44 year-old's vs. 19% of 45-64 year-old's and 18% of seniors
         29% of those with income > $100 K vs. 19% of those with income < $50K

13% said cut SOCIAL SECURITY

         In only two groups did the percentage choosing to cut Social Security pass    20%: 18-29 year-old's (23%) and those with incomes larger than $100K (21%)

I was particularly disheartened by the lack of social conscience among the people of my generation (the millennial crowd) shown by the weakest support for military cuts and strong support for cutting aid to the poor and unemployed.

The comparatively weak support for military cuts among millennials reminded me of a few other troubling statistics I've seen recently.  In a Gallup poll marking the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War, millennials (18-29) were the only age group to believe that going into Vietnam in the 1960s was NOT a mistake (41-43) and had the highest support for the Iraq War of any age group.  Likewise, according to a recent study by the Institute of Politics at Harvard University, young people have more faith in the military than in any other major social/political institution.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Liberty Equality Fraternity and Trees on Thu May 02, 2013 at 09:17 AM PDT.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA and Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.