This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Conservative radio commentator Rush Limbaugh is seen in this police booking mug shot taken on April 28, 2006. Limbaugh turned himself in to police in Florida on Friday and was charged with prescription drug fraud as part of a probe that began more than tw
As no longer seen on TV
The Heritage Foundation's supposed new "immigration study" is being slammed so hard even by fellow conservatives that it threatens to damage the entire organization (and we're talking about a conservative think tank, here, not generally a group known for taking damage due to inane or fraudulent stances). It didn't help that one of the study's co-authors was discovered to have written a previous dissertation on the "substantially lower" IQ of non-white immigrants, a paper which closely paralleled certain parts of the Heritage argument, or that he was revealed to have hung out with a few eyebrow-raising crowds.

It's not all bad, though. Support for both Heritage's much-maligned study and even more maligned co-author came Thursday from, lo and behold, a certain conservative media powerhouse called Rush Limbaugh (No link, but you can find the transcript on his site):

There's also a move out there -- understandably in the Democrat Party, but within certain elements of the Republican Party -- to go after, discredit, and basically blow up the Heritage Foundation study on immigration and the cost of amnesty. […]

You see now, the long knives are out for anybody at Heritage who had anything to do with this.

Wow, what are the odds that Limbaugh would so quickly rally to the Heritage Foundation's defense, even while so much of the rest of the conservative infrastructure hit the ol' eject button just as soon as Heritage released their little "study"? As it turns out, pretty close to 100 percent. Remember the pay-for-praise agreement they've got going with Limbaugh and other conservative radio hosts?
[I]n the midst of a flurry of scrutiny of GOP presidential candidates’ stances on health insurance mandates similar to one included in the 2010 Democratic healthcare overhaul, Limbaugh took to the airwaves to defend Heritage’s past support for such a proposal.

“The Heritage Foundation to this day says they are being impugned and misrepresented in terms of their advocacy for such a thing,” Limbaugh said, explaining that the venerable think tank “abandoned the idea once they saw it implemented” and realized “it doesn’t work.”

Limbaugh, who has been a paid Heritage endorser since 2009, said the reversal did nothing to detract from the “profound … respect for Heritage. Heritage is the gold standard. Heritage was every bit as involved in Reaganism as Reagan was, and nothing’s changed.”

That was in 2011, back when health insurance mandates had to shift quickly from being the conservative/Heritage/Romney "solution" to health care to being an unconscionable abomination unto our liberteez, and Limbaugh was a very useful cog in pulling that little magic trick off. During the same year, Heritage paid Limbaugh over $2 million for "sponsorship" of his show that included "promotional tie-ins" and other personalized, from-the-man-himself testimonials on how very, very wonderful the Heritage Foundation truly was and how everyone that hated them had cooties. This is what's known in the industry as "being a shameless whore."

The pay-for-praise relationship with Rush appears to be an active, ongoing affair. If you ask me, though, Heritage is getting ripped off. Limbaugh defends even obvious racism for free, so why does Heritage have to chip in a few million to get the same results? I suppose the way to look at it is this: Rush isn't defending all those other racist things for free, Heritage is just "sponsoring" them. Not every jackass in America can afford to pay Rush personally, after all.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Hunter on Thu May 09, 2013 at 02:09 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.