This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I gave this article an attractive title to keep you interested because it's about to get really wonky in here. By now you have heard that the IRS and the Obama Administration are getting an understandable amount of flak over the IRS singling out organizations seeking tax-exempt status using ideological criteria to flag applicants. Use of words like "tea party" or "patriot" would bring IRS agents to your door, requesting all sorts of information about your organization. Very scary!

Unless you understand what has happened to the 501(c)(4) status in recent years. This is a category designed to provide a tax-free status to "social welfare" organizations that serve a common good and are not engaged in politics. A bureaucratic decision was made forty years ago to soften the language to primarily not engaged in politics. This means that the occasional lobbying effort or political action wouldn't automatically get your-tax exempt status revoked.

This appeared to be reasonable, it seems, until suddenly there was an explosion of (c)(4) applications (I couldn't help myself) in the years following an ill-fated Supreme Court decision That Shall Not Be Named.

Imagine you're an IRS agent working in office 501C, and suddenly you receive over twice the amount of applications (up to 3,400 from 1,500) than you had in the years before. And imagine most of them appear to be right-wing political action groups who have singled out the (c)(4) status because of the juicy features the filing offers. Features like unlimited donations, nondisclosure of donors, and of course tax exemption. Remember you're supposed to make sure they aren't primarily engaged in politics, which obviously almost all of them are.

I don't know about you but I think I would target the conservative political action groups as possible abusers of this filing status.

And then bureaucracy collided with politics! Suddenly you have what appears to be a scandal of a liberal president's government giving extra tax scrutiny to his political opponents! How dreadful!

Never mind that these conservative PACs actually WERE abusing the tax code.

The mistake the IRS made was in permitting most of these groups to get their (c)(4) status. They asked intrusive questions, they held up applications, but in the end most of them were allowed to go forward, including the blatantly political Crossroads GPS, run by Karl Rove.

Now, there are two things that can happen. Either the 501(c)(4) rules are rewritten, or written more clearly, so that the term primarily actually has some backbone and the IRS can deny these PACs tax-exemption...

OR, more likely, the IRS will scrutinize 501(c)(4) applicants less. They'll rubber-stamp every application, and our political campaigns will be flooded with even more untraceable, untaxed money as a direct result of...

...wait for it...

Citizen's United.



You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.