This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Bill O'Reily 'Talking Points Commentary': 'The Far Left Running Wild: There are entire media operations that exist today solely to promote ideology. This is a bad situation that is getting worse.'
Oh, Bill. I worry about you, fella.
It feels like Fox News is getting stupider. I know that's an almost impossible thing to prove; really, by the time you get to Fox & Friends and people wearing kitchen supplies on their hats and whatever "The Five" is supposed to be you're already in the realm of "things my pet rock told me," but I still think there's a decent case to be made.

Case in point: The "IRS commissioner visited the White House eleventy billion times" conservative conspiracy theory was debunked almost immediately after it first was blurted forth from the conservative blurt-hole, when it turned out that "eleventy billion times" actually meant "less than a dozen times" and the initial confusion was caused because the blurt-holes in question did not understand what they were talking about and had to have it very patiently explained to them. The matter of this particular conspiracy theory being disproved, however, has done nothing to dissuade prominent blurt-hole haver Bill O'Reilly from continuing to state it as fact—nay, as scandal—possibly because he does not know what either of those things are:

"What I can say is that the White House still has not told the nation what the hell ... Douglas Shulman was doing in the White House all those times. What's the holdup, Mr. President? How about that transparency deal?"

The problem, dear Bill, lies not in the White House but in ourselves. Sometimes things are transparent because they are, to be literal about it, clear. This may be one of those Emperor's New Clothes situations in reverse, where White House visitation records are only "transparent" to people who have two neurons to rub together. He is committed to the bit, though, and he has fellow pundits willing to be (cough) committed with him:

The Washington Post's Bob Woodward appeared on O'Reilly's show on Monday and said:

"You say they aren't answering this question about the 157 visits by the IRS commissioner. They should. They should get on top of this story."

While I imagine Bob Woodward and Bill O'Reilly and the rest of Team Pantswetter would like nothing more than for the White House to spend their days explaining themselves to every individual American who has a conspiracy theory about something, how exactly is the White House supposed to get on top of a story that has already been disproven? How many flow charts will be needed, here, to satisfactorily demonstrate that 157 does not equal 11? Is this a level of math that's going to require a Darrell Issa hearing? What about a special math prosecutor, will we need one of those? I can put the movement in touch with some very qualified kindergarten students, if this thing is going to require the sort of top-notch forensic counting that requires both fingers and toes.

The problem here is that the Republican Party has settled quite comfortably into a post-factual movement. Whether or not something is true has nothing to do with whether you can say it and whether other people should believe it: If the black guy seems to be a secretly Muslim Kenyan guy, you just freakin' go with that. If all these stupid scientific measurements are pissing you off, well, it's probably because there's a global conspiracy of scientists who like to piss you off. Duh.

In the past, we generally countered such things by relying on the people surrounding a gigantic, red-faced liar to themselves have enough of a sense of shame to back slowly from the bastard. That only works, though, if there is still a general sense of shame that can be summoned up—in other words, if being a lying bastard has some consequence. That doesn't work anymore, because the "consequence" of being a lying, conspiracy-peddling bastard is that other people will give you your own television show.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Hunter on Thu Jun 06, 2013 at 11:41 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.