This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I'm a proud, apoplectic, left wing, radical!


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

There are a lot of ostensible Leftists here on Kos. Enough to disprove the idea that the Left is some sort of monolith. There's a wide spread and variety of opinion. So any criticism of "the Left" is by definition going to be partial rather than general. There's no "party line", contrary to what both some Leftist and their opponents would prefer to think.

What you have is a number of trends in thought and opinion, some of which are in conflict with each other. Not all leftists think that Noam Chomsky hung the moon. Not all Leftists treat Marx as gospel. Not all Leftists view Liberalism as a greater threat than the RW. Likewise, there are Leftists who do. The Left, such as it is, is a mixed and unruly bag.

Such a hodgepodge requires the use of critical analytical skills to make one's way through the thickets of competing views and opinions.

Not everyone is comfortable with this. Some seem to think that the Left should be exempt from critical self examination. This is a mindset that refuses to recognize error or account for its failures. A mindset that explains every loss in terms of forces beyond its control. That implicitly denies its ability to influence or shape events. That, consequently, produces an exaggerated siege mentality that treats any suggestion of critical self examination as an attack. Such attitudes are getting a lot of play in the current NSA debates.

For some of us this has a very familiar and dismal aspect. Self ghettoization and the resultant insularity and sectarian blindness have been a perennial plague on the Left. It has contributed substantially to the marginalization and consequent political irrelevance of the Left in the US.

Apparently, some political fundamentals need to be re-emphasized.

The first among these is that a refusal to consider criticism, whether constructive or hostile, is a sign of political and ideological bankruptcy. It amounts to a refusal to learn from mistakes. Indeed, a refusal to admit the possibility of error. This is true regardless of the bias of the critic. If you want to learn where the weaknesses of your own arguments and analysis are located, the best place to look is in the critiques of your political enemies. Particularly so when they've been cleaning your clock for several decades.

This would seem obvious but you would never know it from the way that some react. For far too many the substance of a criticism takes a back seat to political bias. Far too many seem to believe that the presumed or actual political bias of a critic some how invalidates the factual substance of a criticism. For some this canard has taken on the status of a theoretical absolute, despite its being the textbook definition of the ad hominem fallacy. Equally destructive is the correlative belief that any dissent from the supposedly "orthodox" Left position identifies the critic as a political enemy.

Again, this is nothing new. Nor is this sort of ersatz religiousity unique to the Left. However, it's no concern of mine if the RW and other reactionary movements engage in this kind of ultimately self defeating behavior. In fact I would encourage them to do so. Nothing would suit me better than to see them sideline themselves in the same way that the Left has repeatedly done over the last 40 years.

What does concern me is the need for a healthy, militant and effective Left in the US. If either the US as a democracy or the planet as a whole are to survive, this is the immediate and overriding necessity. The stakes do not allow for indulging in this sort of ritualism. A quasi theological intolerance for differences of opinion isn't something we can afford. A movement more interested in creating enemies rather than creating allies is an irrelevance in the making.


Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.