This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Recently there has been much debate over a farm bill that expands taxpayer-subsidized crop insurance and rejects cuts in food stamps for the poor. The issue is a sensitive one and touches the very core of democrat and republican ideologies.

The democrats want to help the poor and prevent them from starving while the republicans want to cut government expenditure. Both sides have some valid arguments but instead of having a calm and factual debate the issue has become politicized, as is all too often the case.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

I'd like to suggest a compromise. The cost of the food stamp program, formerly known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), has risen at an alarming rate. In 2002 the cost of the program was almost 21 bln dollars but in 2012 it was over 78 bln. Something clearly needs to be done.
Now, I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't help the poor but I do think the food stamp program needs to be completely reformed. 47 mln Americans are on food stamps and that's a huge number but I'd like to focus on the cost.

Here's an idea. It's well know that there's a huge waste in the food industry and the supply chain. The USDA estimates that supermarkets lose $15 billion annually in unsold fruits and vegetables alone. One industry consultant estimated that up to one in seven truckloads of perishables delivered to supermarkets is thrown away. Most stores pull items off the shelves 2 to 3 days before the sell-by date. Other waste includes damaged packaging, outdated promotional products and unpopular items.

On the one hand the government is spending billions to feed the poor and on the other hand we have all this food waste. Why can't we just give the wasted food to the poor? Instead of the stores just throwing away food, which they can't sell, they could instead give it to people, who are covered by the food stamp program.

Just to make this kind of solution more attractive to the retailers they could add the value of this food to their operational costs, thus decreasing their taxes. Also, because of consumer awareness, the retailers, who are part of the program, would get a sort of free promotion because they help the poor.
With the right kinds of incentives for retailers it would be possible to shift the entire cost of the food stamp program on to the private sector.

Extended (Optional)


Should the private sector take on a greater role of feeding the poor?

77%14 votes
11%2 votes
11%2 votes

| 18 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.