This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Michael McAuliff and Sabrina Siddiqui of Huffington Post moseyed over to Capitol Hill today and uncovered something interesting.  At least three Republican senators who helped torpedo Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey's compromise proposal to stiffen background checks for gun purchases are among the loudest cheerleaders for the NSA's wiretapping program.  The common theme?  They'd previously echoed the NRA shibboleth that Manchin-Toomey would ultimately lead to the government taking away our guns.  And yet, they support an NSA program that is several times more invasive.

The logic leap starts at the very top.

"This bill is a clear overreach that will predominantly punish and harass our neighbors, friends, and family," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who voted against proceeding to debate the issue of gun control.

But on Tuesday, the Kentucky Republican defended the controversial NSA surveillance programs that sweep up data on phone calls and Internet activities, essentially making the case that the efforts are justified and legal.

"What is clear from this information released by the [director of National Intelligence] is that each of these programs is authorized by law, overseen by Congress and the courts and subject to ongoing and rigorous oversight," McConnell said.

"Given the scope of these programs, it's understandable that many would be concerned about issues related to privacy," he added, but concluded that they were "lawful programs created to protect the American people."

HuffPo also talked to Richard Shelby and Lindsey Graham, who expressed similar sentiments.  Shelby claimed that if the NSA ever managed to peep in on his conversations by mistake, he wasn't concerned about it because "I'm not doing anything wrong."  And yet, he managed to say with a straight face that he opposes any measure that amounted to "tinkering" with the bill of rights.  This guy used to be a Dem?

And Graham claimed that terrorists who "want to destroy our way of life" aren't the same thing as "someone who's mentally disturbed and goes into a school."  This guy is supposedly one of the saner Republicans from the South?

About the only reason this kind of thinking makes any kind of sense at all is that PRISM was actually started under Bush.  


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.