This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

There is obviously no clear and agreed upon definition of the politically potent term terrorism. The phenomenon of people making violent attacks intended to serve some kind of political purpose has been going on pretty much since human societies became complex enough to have formal political institutions. However, in US political discourse since 9/11 use of the term seems to have some recurring themes. They are generally related to our perceptions of that attack and the fear that similar incidents could recur on a regular basis. Those elements include:

Organized and carried out by people who are not US citizens

Aimed at US civilians on US soil

Motivated by an anti-US ideoligical movement, most likely with an Islamic connection

The justifications that have been offered by government officials for the various activities of the NSA and CIA have focused on keeping Americans safe from threats that appear to fall within this framework.

There was one basic reason that the perpetrators of 9/11 were actually able to pull it off  - sloppy airline security. If the procedures that were supposed to be in place had been closely adhered to, there is a very good chance that they would have been stopped at the gate. One of the first responses to the incident was establishing the TSA and that I believe is why we have not had another incident of similar airline violence. Airport security is annoying and inconvenient, but it definitely appears to be worth the investment.

As far as I can tell we really haven't had anymore terrorist attacks on American soil by non-US citizens. In the 12 years since 9/11 the first incident to come along that sort of qualifies is the Boston bombing earlier this year. We have had a number of reports of various plots, but nothing has actually happened. The Boston incident was carried out by two brothers who were US citizens at the time. What is of course ironic is that the older brother had been identified as someone with possible terrorist connections, but that information was not used to make any attempt to prevent the attacks.

In the meantime during those 12 years Americans have faced many other threats of violence and a number of them have lost their lives as a result. Three incidents that come quickly to mind are the mass shootings in Tucson, AZ, Aurora, CO and Newton, CN. The perpetrators of these incidents were white American men and are being labeled as mentally ill rather than ideologically motivated. There has been a strong public outcry for an effective government response to at least reduce the risk of such tragic occurrences. Our political system is paralyzed and unable to respond. These are of course just three very well known incidents. Americans die everyday because of gun accidents and deliberate gun violence.

We are being told that foreign terrorism poses such a horrible threat that we must expect to make compromises to strike a balance between our civil liberties and privacy on one hand and the need for national security on the other. This all strikes me as essentially disingenuous propaganda. The government is spending many billions on its ever expanding surveillance system. It is not doing that to protect Americans from something that poses a very minimal threat. The purposes lie elsewhere. We don't really know where the main focus of all this surveillance really is. Perhaps some of the information that is being revealed will shed some light on it.      



You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)


Your Email has been sent.