This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

What an odd title but that is exactly what is going on in Egypt right now. A similar juxtaposition also occurred inside the minds of some Americans back on July 4th, 1863 (exactly 150 years ago) as they begin to bury the dead from both sides in Gettysburg. Since human beings are 99.5% the same, what Egypt is now forbearing must create some intro-inspection upon how things are boding here in the US as well.

I was shown an email passed among Tea Partiers that whooped:  "Egypt got rid of  their dictator; Why can't we get rid of ours?"   Ironically the popular vote percents are strikingly similar... Morsi won with  51.7%;  Obama with 51.1%...   Yet Egypt is in the middle of a coup; and Obama is being hailed as the first since Dwight to have solidly won over 51% for both terms...

Just looking at a chart over our nation's history one sees just how tight our popular vote margin is.  (one also sees the margin of victory is a bad indicator of just how good a president will be)...

Apparently it's a good thing we have an electoral college to decide matters for us, and create a more determinable method of preventing what many Egyptians and many of out tea partiers think should happen now....

I know many decry Bush's win (-0.51%)  over Gore and use that to promote an amendment to abolish the Electoral College.  However


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

America survived far better than Egypt (+1.7%) is doing  now,  with even worse violations against the the  popular vote total...  Through the House of Representatives, these people became President:  Benjamin Harrison (-0.83%), Rutherford B. Hayes (-3.00%), and John Quincy Adams (-10.44%) all with a greater of a percentage loss than had George W. Bush over Gore.  In two of the three, the loser returned to whomp the stealer out of his second term.  One of those "losers" lost despite also having a 51% popular vote majority!

But the electoral college provided decisiveness, and just as in football or basketball, the final score may not portray the better team, but it provides a finality from which we can all move on to the next round.
The demise of Morsi provides a great opportunity to bring up the wisdom behind this electoral college issue, or simply to force us to understand why our founding fathers who were unburdened at that point by political parties, could by using what today are called "thought models", come up with this peculiar institution that has well served it's test over time.  Couple that to the fact that even today, we have something almost akin to a political party vying for a forced overthrow (using their newly acquired 2nd Amendment rights) of our our elected top official,  one can imagine the rancor and violence that might have tainted our nation's  development if we did not have some clear uncontestable "score" that determined our winners from losers.
One must be cautious when comparing today's Egypt with today's American democracy.  Egypt is in its founding stages.  As Morsi proclaimed, removing him removes all legitimacy of any future democratically elected government, as did Julius Caesar to all future democracy in Rome.
It makes us realize how lucky we are today that all of America was solidly unified behind one man, George Washington as it's first head of state.  That unanimity of opinion, allowed the slow formation of  traditions we now have today to take root.   For one, Washington did not impose himself (as did Morsi) by aligning with either the Democrats or Federalists on policy at the expense of the other.

Morsi made that mistake with the Muslim Brotherhood.   Instead, unlike the current head of Egypt,   George Washington held court over a myriad of opinions, and picked and chose in the fashion of King Solomon (almost the same as he did at the Constitutional Convention),  of which was the most judicious approach on the basis of each proposal's merits.  It is worth noting,  that towards the end of his second term as the political parties were genisising for the upcoming  1798 race,  he found himself becoming quite disgusted with the smears, dirt, graft, and corruption required to enable any country to run effectively upon its own power...

Perhaps because Egypt did not endure such a long war of Independence, it does not respect the true sacrificial cost of freedom.  Perhaps because democracy came to Egypt too quickly in its first time like a pack of chewing gum gets snatched in a cashiers line, they easily think they can replace him again with a better flavor?
But before castigating Egypt for this action, this foreboding irony behind Egypt remains.   Instead of comparing it with American Democracy, suppose we go Godwin and compare it to the German election of 1932.  What if the Germans had risen up one year later against Hitler and thrown him out?  That would be  good thing right?  Or had Mao been pushed out and the Chinese business reforms begun 40 years earlier?   Or had North Korea said "uh, no" to its dictator in his first year?  Or had Centrists in Iran risen and with the backing of their army prevailed over the Ayatollah?

The Turkish Army as well as the Pakistani Army has on occasion stepped in and then later bowed out whenever civilian control has become precarious.  Perhaps this may be the only model that works well for overly excitable Arab populations?  It can be called the longterm democracy model with military safeguards built into its Constitution.

But one thing very clear from this current outcome is this:  religion can and should play NO part in government, even if given a political mandate. Living vicariously through Egypt it is clear there must always be an impenetrable wall between that which belongs to Caesar, and that which belongs to God. All political entities who have dared mix religion into their political framework, have populations who are deeply suffering now (relative to those in strictly secular governments), even when that religious entity is the Chairman of the ruling political party himself, as is the case in North Korea, the old Soviet Union, or as was of Japan and Germany during the second world war...

It's a lesson the US should take to heart.  The next time you hear anyone decry we need more religious people in our democracy, cut them off with this:  "Remember Iran; Remember Egypt."
As Americans we are not immune to Civil War.  From ours we learned it is a horrible alternative to walk away from one's existing structure simply because one does not get one's own way...  We also learned that one can't impose one's will on vast majorities of ourselves who think differently.

Third.  We learned that freedom is great, but the need to eat is greater.  Government first has to function to meet the basic needs of its citizens; only then, once its citizens are economically stable enough to be not worried whether they will be alive the day after tomorrow,  can their thoughts begin to turn to esoteric topics such as does democracy even matter in the long run!

As US policy,  our actions need to first get Egypt to feed themselves; Spare no expense; make it our generation's Marshall Plan. Then once well fed and able to provide for themselves, can we begin to later proselytize our points of view.  Whether they choose democracy or totalitarianism, will depend solely on who they see helping them now in their time of need...

 One can talk of democracy's long-term future implications, but that rings hollow on deaf ears when all the recipient really wonders, is whether they will be alive the day after tomorrow.
Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.