This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

To the surprise of absolutely no one following climate change politics, Republicans are voting against their districts' health and safety. A new report from House Energy and Commerce Democrats reveals a climate disconnect. The report finds that Republican members representing the districts most affected by record high temperatures cast anti-climate votes 96% of the time in the 112th Congress. No similar "climate disconnect" was found in the voting records of House Democrats; Democratic members representing districts most affected by high temperatures voted 86% of the time to uphold the Administration’s authority to address climate change or to act to address climate change.

The greatest number of record-setting daily high temperatures in 2012 were
experienced in ten Congressional districts all represented by Republicans: Nebraska 3rd, represented by Adrian Smith; South Dakota At Large, represented by Kristi Noem; Wyoming At Large, represented by Cynthia Lummis; Kansas 1st, represented by Tim Huelskamp; Missouri 6th, represented by Sam Graves; Iowa 4th, represented by Steve King; Colorado 3rd, represented by Scott Tipton; Texas 13th, represented by Mac Thornberry; Texas 19th, represented by Randy Neugebarger; and Arkansas 1st, represented by Rick Crawford. 97% of their votes on climate were opposed to action and in favor of frying their districts.

For comparison's sake, the ten Democratic-represented congressional districts with the highest number of record temperatures were Iowa’s 1st and 2d, Minnesota’s 7th, New Mexico’s 3d, Wisconsin’s 3d, Minnesota’s 1st, West Virginia’s 3d, Maine’s 2d, Mississippi’s 2d, and Colorado’s 2d. Democratic members representing the districts with the most record high temperatures voted 79% of the time to uphold Administration authority to address climate change or to otherwise act to address climate change. Only two of the Democratic members representing these districts – Reps. Collin Peterson (MN-7) and Nick Rahall (WV-3) – voted for the anti-climate position more than half the time.

If the Republicans truly cared about the people of their districts, they would connect the dots between their actions and the health and safety of the people they represent. They don't. They're too beholden to the fossil fuel industry and too disconnected from the people they nominally represent. It's time to vote them out of office. Climate Hawks Vote, a new project with the slogan: "Climate matters. We vote," aims to do just that.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.