You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Critics of the tactics and personalities of Snowden and Greenwald, and everybody desiring more checks and balances on the surveillance community, would benefit from paying more attention to the following points:
1. Normal personalities are cowed into silence by fully rational fear of retaliation, so only special personalities take the risk of angering powerful and secretive forces. (An example that should be evocative for Americans of virtually any political stripe is Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, whose publicizing of the Soviet Gulag was valuable regardless of his personality or political views).
2. Once an individual becomes the target of powerful forces’ retaliatory scrutiny, spinning, isolation, pressure and/or threats, the individual will naturally feel like a martyr.
3. Even a martyr may retain an instinct for self-preservation, and cannot possibly avoid all missteps under this type of pressure and scrutiny, so it is inevitable that the targeted individual will offend many sensibilities and legitimate concerns of the forces that are targeting him or her, and of bystanders.
4. Bystanders who are tempted to focus on refining and debating their views on heroes & villains, would be better served by focusing more on:
the present opportunity to strengthen checks and balances in and on the surveillance community (of governments, their private contractors, and other private organizations),
the likely weakening of this opportunity after Snowden and Greenwald disappear from media front pages, and
how to seize this opportunity NOW! (Hint: pushing for domestic legislation and perhaps international treaties is more important than soliciting or parsing comments on Snowden or Greenwald).