You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Last month, Gov. Howard Dean penned an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal in which he called a key cost-controlling measure of the Affordable Care Act, Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) "essentially a health-care rationing body," adding his voice to the chorus of attacks, usually coming from Republicans, on the board. He didn't call it a death panel, like Republicans do, and did praise the overall law, but he also opened up room for vulnerable Democrats to hop on the partial repeal bandwagon.
A wave of vulnerable Democrats over the past three months has signed on to bills repealing the board’s powers, including Sen. Mark Pryor (Ark.) and Reps. Ron Barber (Ariz.), Ann Kirkpatrick (Ariz.), Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.) and Elizabeth Esty (Conn.).
All five are considered vulnerable in next year’s election, highlighting the stakes and the political angst surrounding the healthcare measure. [...]
Two of the lawmakers explained their opposition by suggesting the board would limit care for Medicare patients.
There are some things the IPAB can do, some things it may do, and some things it is prohibited from doing. It can propose changes in how some providers are paid or how care is organized. Congress may substitute other ways of reaching the spending targets, but if it does not, the IPAB recommendations take effect. The IPAB may suggest ways to change the health care system outside Medicare. But these recommendations have no binding legal force. The IPAB is prohibited from making any recommendations that would result in health care rationing or that would change Medicare benefits, premiums, deductibles, or cost-sharing.
It can't, by law, ration care. Period. At this point, any power it does have is actually theoretical. It would only kick in if projected Medicare spending exceeded a target level, at which point it makes recommendations on how to reduce Medicare spending. Those recommendations only actually happen if Congress doesn't come up with another solution, and—all together now—it cannot make recommendations that "would result in health care rationing or that would change Medicare benefits, premiums, deductibles, or cost-sharing."
Also, too, it's all theoretical because the 15-member board doesn't exist right now and won't in the near future because the positions have to be nominated by the president, and confirmed by the Senate. Like Republicans are gonna let that happen. Also, too, the CBO says increases in Medicare spending have slowed to the point that the spending target where the IPAB kicks in isn't likely to be reached until 2022.
There is no reality-based reason for Democrats to jump on the repeal IPAB train. None. Unless your reality includes the fact that the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association and the pharmaceutical lobby have supported IPAB repeal, are all lobbying you to do so, and tying their potential support of your next campaign to it.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Thu Aug 08, 2013 at 01:16 PM PDT.