You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Yesterday, Jackie Speier appeared on Face the Nation and claimed that commanding officers shouldn't have the final say on whether to bring sexual assault charges. As exhibit A, she dropped a bombshell--an Army general is himself being court-martialed for sexual assault. That general is Brigadier General Jeffrey Sinclair, who is only the third general in half a century to face a court martial. I briefly mentioned the case yesterday. But after doing some more digging, I thought it merited a diary by itself.
The full charge sheet is available here. Sinclair is charged with engaging in a three-year affair with a female captain 17 years his junior, even though he's married with two kids. The affair continued when they were both stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was an open secret for some time, but no one reported it even though any relationship between a commanding officer and a subordinate is verboten.
It only burst into the open in March 2012, when the captain was snooping through Sinclair's email and discovered love notes to his wife and another female officer. She immediately told the 82nd Airborne's commander, James L. Higgins. During the ensuing investigation, the captain claimed Sinclair had forced her to perform oral sex twice in Afghanistan. Higgins reportedly ordered Sinclair not to contact the woman again, but Sinclair reportedly sent at least one text to her afterward. Sinclair is also charged with having inappropriate relationships with three other female officers. They found steamy emails from at least two of them, but there was no evidence he ever had sex with them.
Sinclair claims the captain is lying in order to keep from being drummed out of the Army herself for adultery. He also claims that the military is making him a scapegoat in response to demands from Washington to get tough on sexual assault. In an unusual move, Sinclair has hired a public relations firm to make his case. They've even gone as far as to create a Website to argue their side.
Yesterday, Speier said that "the heart of the system is not working properly" when a commanding officer is being brought up on sexual assault charges. Reading this case, it's hard not to agree.
Originally posted to Trial Watch on Mon Aug 19, 2013 at 07:23 AM PDT.