This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

When reports of a chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government began emerging late last week, they were met with skepticism. Among the questions raised was why Syrian President Bashir al-Assad would do such a thing. Syrian government forces had been making battlefield gains, and were not in the sort of desperate position that would explain such a dramatic action. Such a massacre - Doctors Without Borders reported 355 dead men, women, and children, killed by a neurotoxin, and over 3000 injured - would be a highly provocative act that brought with it the possibility of armed intervention by the West. What motive could they have for such an act?

Join me below the calligraphy dp for one possible explanation.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Throughout the Syrian Civil War, and for many years prior, the Syrian government has been an Iranian ally. As regional politics have broken down along sectarian lines, pitting Sunni vs. Shia, in the aftermath of the American invasion of Iraq, that relationship has only grown stronger. Against this backdrop, the United States has been engaged in a standoff with Iran over its nuclear program. American-led international sanctions have brought relations to a low point. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinijad took a hard line against a negotiated settlement with the United States, and both countries settled in for the long haul. This was all to the good for Syria.

And then, in mid-June, the Iranian Presidential elections were won by Hassan Rouhani, who signaled throughout his campaign that he would take a softer line towards talks with the Americans, and who confirmed his desire for a negotiated settlement upon taking office.

Fast forward five weeks, and this happened: the CIA released documents confirming - to the utter surprise of nobody - that it was involved in the 1953 coup that overthrew Iranian President Mohammed Mossedegh. This past weekend, the CIA, perhaps discovering that confession is good for the soul, came clean on yet another old sin: they released files showing American complicity in the Iraqi chemical weapons attacks against Iran during the Iran-Iraq War.

Why the sudden openness, and why about Iran? One explanation is that the Obama administration is taking steps to demonstrate its good faith ahead of a new round of talks with Iran. Syria has a great deal to lose from any rapprochement between Iran and the US, particularly given its reliance on support from the Iranian government and the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah, another Iranian client. An American attack on Syria could put any such warming of relations on indefinite hold.

Why would Assad launch a chemical weapons attack at this juncture, knowing that it could well generate an American military response? Perhaps because provoking an American military response is exactly what he is hoping for.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.