This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Larry Summers, at Canada 2020 in November 2012
September and still the wrong person for Fed head.
A few other matters of national concern have sent the choice of who will be the next chairman of the Federal Reserve to the back burner of media priorities of late. But the New York Times editorial board resurrected that discussion Thursday by putting in a good word for the Fed's Deputy Chair Janet Yellen. And a big thumbs-down for the man said to be President Obama's first choice, Larry Summers.

When critics of Summers were alerted by the Financial Times in late May that he was the president's favorite for replacing current chairman Ben Bernanke when his term runs out in January, they pointed out what a bad, bad choice he is. Some of their critics said it was premature to be knocking him when only unnamed sources were saying Obama wanted him for the job. From additional reports, however, it became clear fairly soon that Summers was, at the very least, high on the list. Eventually, the president himself said so, noting that Yellen and some others were as well.

Before that admission, however, an opposition to Summers had started growing. It included 19 senators who wrote a letter to the president urging him, without mentioning Summers's name, to choose Yellen. This opposition spurred the president to defend Summers vigorously at the end of July.

Summers is, in fact, a rotten choice for the post. As the Times board points out:

Mr. Summers’s reputation is replete with evidence of a temperament unsuited to lead the Fed. He is known for cooperation when he works with those he perceives as having more power than he does, and for dismissiveness toward those he perceives as less powerful. Those traits would be especially destructive at the Fed, where board members and regional bank presidents all bring their own considerable political power and intellectual heft to the Fed’s decision-making on monetary policy and financial regulation. Putting Mr. Summers in charge would risk institutional discord or worse, dysfunction.

His record on financial regulation is abysmal, and he has not acknowledged the errors. In the late 1990s, Mr. Summers was instrumental in deregulating derivatives and in repealing the Glass-Steagall banking law. He has said that the resulting financial crisis was unforeseeable, which is wrong. He waged public battles against regulators who correctly argued for regulating derivatives and disparaged the comments of a prominent economist who early on identified risks in the too-big-to-fail banking system. This is precisely the wrong background for the next Fed leader, who will take charge in the middle of the delayed rule-making for the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

There's more from the distant and recent past. All in all, plenty of reasons not to appoint Summers to a post in which the regulatory role of the Fed will be greater than ever before. That's something Yellen is way more suited for temperamentally and philosophically than Summers.

Before dropping below the fold to read more, please join us in urging President Obama not to appoint Larry Summers as Federal Reserve chair, and consider appointing Deputy Chair Janet Yellen instead.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Much has been made of the fact that Yellen and Summers are practically twins on monetary policy. That would be true of anyone with a ghost of a chance of being picked as chair. (If Ron Paul or some other gold-bug were in the running, there would be some contrast in that arena.) But it's Yellen's record as a believer in a cooperative approach and her support for regulation rather than deregulation that matters when picking between her and Summers.

Much has also been made by some critics about the idea that Yellen is "Wall Street's candidate."

This assessment arose after release of a CNBC survey in July. What a joke. The claim is based on CNBC's on-line monthly Fed questionnaire. Just 40 “economists, traders and strategists” returned the questionnaire. Of these, 28 said Obama would choose Yellen and 20 said he should do so. Wow! Fifty percent!! But the idea that the support of 20 people makes Yellen Wall Street's choice is ludicrous.

Obviously there are other possible candidates. For instance, Christina Romer, the former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, who butted heads with Summers when they were both in the White House, and recently noted that he might contribute to dysfunction were he selected to head the Fed. Or Thomas Hoenig, currently chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Or Sheila Bair, the former chairperson of the FDIC. Or someone way outside the box, say, Ann Markusen. But realistically speaking, it's Summers or Yellen.

The Times says:

Senators who have endorsed Ms. Yellen would do well to let Mr. Obama know, either publicly or through back channels, that their endorsement translates into a no vote for Mr. Summers.
On the 22-member Senate Banking Committee are three Democratic senators who are likely to say no: Jeff Merkley of Oregon; Sherrod Brown of Ohio; and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. Huzzah to them. And may they persuade several of their committee colleagues to do likewise.

In late August, Daily Kos delivered 130,000 petition signatures to Sen. Brown's office urging support for Yellen. But we're not done. You can add to that by signing here.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 09:17 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.