You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
On this blog I write a lot about policy outcomes. Meaning that programs and policy should be evaluated for sound outcomes. We should only be funding and running programs that are actually achieving preferred policy outcomes for the greatest good. The SNAP program which has a stated policy goal of offering nutrition assistance to millions of eligible, low-income individuals and families and provides economic benefits to communities.
The House voted today to slash the SNAP program by $40 billion dollars. SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as The Food Stamps Program, is not only good policy for the fact that is helps families put much needed food on the table during touch economic times but is an economic booster to our economy as a whole. Every $5 dollars in new SNAP spending benefits generated $9.00 in total community spending. Since the SNAP program is increasing in correlation with the unemployment we would assume policy makers would want to provide people assistance with their food needs while simultaneously improving the overall economic output. It turns out that the SNAP program
SNAP is not only an economic booster to our economy the SNAP program has 98% accuracy rate for eligible households. The program goes through a rigorous measurement analysis pooling a sample size of 50,000 participants in the program to thoroughly review for fraudulent payments. In fact the program goes through such a rigorous analysis for misappropriated payments that we have actually seen a decline in the program. According to one internal audit only 3% of over payments were actually made to recipients.
As far as sound public policy is concerned the SNAP program is an important aspect of not only our collective responsibility to help those in need through government action but this is a cost effective program that have high returns for all society.