This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

(This was written by my niece Bernadette Wilson Conley. She has a Masters is Sociology from the University of North Carolina Greensboro. She asked if I would share this with you.)

The Time.com website recently published an article including a map of, what researchers described as, "The Geography of U.S. Hate." It was intended to show where "homophobes and racists live in the U.S." based on hate speech filled Tweets.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

As I quickly glanced at the map, I began to wonder about the methodology. Further exploration shows several flaws in the premise behind this piece of social science research. The researchers didn't measure hate speech in the U.S. They measured hate speech on Twitter, and even that was done poorly. (Original article link: http://newsfeed.time.com/...)

Twitter and Tweets are a very inaccurate measure of hate speech in the U.S., or of any aspect of the U.S. population at large. I learned, with a short amount of research, that only about 18% of the U.S. population uses Twitter each month. Users are disproportionately under 30 and live in large cities - both compared to the U.S. population at large and the majority of U.S. internet users. About half of Twitter account holders never post anything and instead log on only to follow other accounts they are interested in. A single Twitter User can produce a disproportionate number of Tweets. This makes me wonder why news channels are so eager to report what is trending and being said on Twitter by less than 10% of the U.S. population.

The researchers didn't measure hate speech in the U.S. Instead, they measured Twitter popularity in the U.S. based on total number of Tweets and then adjusted the numbers down to show hate speech on the medium. If the researchers were determined to use Twitter as a tool for measuring hate speech in the U.S., they could have sorted the Tweets by user and area, tagged which users posted hate speech in Tweets during a specified time period (limiting the influence of single high volume users), and produced a map showing % of Twitter Users with Hate Speech Posts. Even then, the proper label for the map would be "The Geography of Hate Speech on Twitter in the U.S."

If you want to see a Map of Hate in the U.S., try checking out Southern Poverty Law Center's website, which shows active hate groups in the U.S. (Link here: www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map). An even better map would be produced if researchers could record and show where hate crimes have been committed - though there would still need to be a disclaimer of variability due both to differences in local laws and the willingness of local authorities to prosecute.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.