You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Via TPM, here's the initial White House reaction to the latest debt ceiling proposal from House Republicans:
"The president is happy that at least cooler heads seem to be prevailing in House," Carney told reporters at a daily press conference.
“The president strongly prefers a longer term solution," Carney added. "We'll see what the House Republicans propose and see what they are able to pass."
Carney's second point is a good one: Despite holding a press conference, House Republicans were exceedingly vague about the details of what they are demanding in exchange for raising the debt limit—and we still don't know whether they can even manage to pass whatever it is that they eventually propose.
If Republicans were to propose a clean debt ceiling increase, Carney said President Obama would "likely" sign it, even though he would prefer a longer term extension.
If a clean debt limit bill is passed, he would likely sign it. Again, we would have to see it. We're speaking about a bill that does not at this point exist and it's not at all clear based on what the Speaker said that that's what we're going to see.
As Carney again noted, Republicans have yet to offer concrete details of what they are proposing. According to a report from National Journal, Republicans aren't actually going to demand anything in the bill...
There will be no specific language attached to the bill mandating any negotiating framework from the White House. "It's just a handshake," said Rep. John Fleming of Louisiana.
...but until we see language that Republicans are actually able to pass through the House, reports like that are just speculation. But if they agree to take the threat of default off the table, the White House won't stand in their way.
10:54 AM PT: One thing worth paying attention to is whether the House includes language barring the Treasury Department from using extraordinary measures to avoid default. If they do that (and indications are that they plan to), it would probably kill their plan, because barring Treasury from avoiding a default would actually further weaponize the debt limit. It also is an extremely hard position to defend (it's sort of like banning firefighters from fighting fires) so it would be sort of nuts for House Republicans to insist on it. Then again, they are sort of nuts.
If they don't include language barring extraordinary measures, then a six-week debt limit suspension would probably last much longer than six weeks. The last time Congress raised the debt limit was in February when they suspended it for about three months, through mid-May. But thanks to extraordinary measures, we've avoided default for nearly five months.