You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
More than 22 million people—elderly, children, the disabled—were kept out of poverty in 2012 thanks to Social Security. That's a new estimate from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Without Social Security benefits, 44.4 percent of elderly Americans would have incomes below the official poverty line, all else being equal. With Social Security, only 9.1 percent do.
Given the program’s powerful anti-poverty impact, cuts in Social Security benefits could significantly raise poverty—particularly among the elderly and the disabled—depending on their design. [...]
Social Security accounts for two-thirds of income for its elderly beneficiaries, on average. And more than a third of beneficiaries—generally the oldest and poorest—rely on Social Security for at least 90 percent of their income.
Cutting Social Security would hurt people. Period. There are plenty of reasons for it being stupid policy. But the fact that it's immoral, that it would throw millions of people into crippling poverty, should be enough to make it unthinkable. It's not. There are still Democrats, including budget committee member Rep. Chris Van Hollen, who are fine with trading away Social Security benefits cuts for something as little as tax code reform.
Social Security—and the millions of people it's saving from poverty—should not be on the negotiating table. Instead of talking about cutting Social Security, Democrats should be talking about expanding it to get all older Americans out of poverty.
“The budget proposed by Congressman Van Hollen and House Democrats does not include chained CPI for Social Security, and he has consistently opposed that as part of a budget deal. We shouldn't be balancing the budget on the backs of seniors and the most vulnerable.” – Bridgett Frey, spokeswoman for Congressman Chris Van Hollen
Thanks, Rep. Van Hollen.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Oct 25, 2013 at 12:35 PM PDT.