This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

The unconstitutional Arizona harassment statute, a favorite tool of the police state of Arizona and Sheriff Joe Arpaio used to silence dissent, is challenged in the United States Supreme Court in Huminski v. City of Surprise, Arizona.  The statute is unconstitutionally vague, unconstitutionally over broad and targets expression protected under the First Amendment. A nice fit for Arizona it seems.

The Statute is here...


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).


Huminski v. City of Surprise, Arizona  
Washington D.C.

In a filing received by the U.S. Supreme Court, government is portrayed  fervently defending a state criminal harassment statute that makes any speech contrary to the government's goals a crime under, AZ Rev. Stat. § 13-2921 (criminal harassment)

Speech that tends to "alarm, annoy or harass" anyone, including government officials and police, is a crime in Arizona. Silencing dissent is the hallmark of a police state.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari here...


Worth noting is that thirty five (35) other States, the District of Columbia and Guam have exempted constitutionally protected conduct from their harassment (or similar stalking) statutes.  Not Arizona, silencing dissent is too important to the republican led legislature of that primitive State.

No surprise that this statute exists in Arizona.  Under the patently unconstitutionally vague and overbroad harassment statute, this Supreme Court litigation is a crime as is this post when read by a resident of Arizona, say … Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  No doubt that the litigation and this article tends to "annoy" the Sheriff and like-minded residents of Arizona.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to scottx1 on Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 03:59 PM PDT.

Also republished by Phoenix Kossacks.


Is the Arizona Harassment statute constitutional?

32%12 votes
29%11 votes
13%5 votes
18%7 votes
5%2 votes

| 37 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.