You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
The Senate is set to hold a first vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act late Monday afternoon, and is ultimately expected to pass the bill with several Republican votes. But in the House, Republicans seem dead set against the bill prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. No surprise, right? Except it kind of is: Back in 2007, both Rep. Paul Ryan and the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, Rep. Greg Walden, voted for ENDA.
What’s more, as late as 2010, when the measure was being debated again, both Ryan and Walden were sticking up for the basic principle at the heart of ENDA. Said Ryan: “I think ENDA’s the right thing to do.” Said Walden: “I don’t believe in discrimination in the workplace.”
In fairness, in those same interviews, both Ryan and Walden opposed the inclusion of protections for transgendered Americans. And that protection is in the current version set to pass the Senate. But Boehner’s statement grounds House GOP opposition to today’s version of ENDA in the notion that it will lead to frivolous lawsuits and kill jobs, not in transgender protections.
Let's face it, if you "don't believe in discrimination in the workplace," allowing it to continue for gay people because you actually do believe in discrimination in the workplace when it comes to transgender people is a position that will make very few people happy. But, as noted, transgender protections aren't what Republicans are talking about. They're talking about religious liberty, despite a very broad religious exemption in the current version of ENDA. They're talking about all those frivolous lawsuits that might happen, even though they haven't happened in the states that already have ENDA-like laws. (To say nothing of the idea that it's somehow frivolous to sue because you lost your job not because of how well you did your job but because of sexual or gender identity.) But transgender protections? Many Republicans oppose them, just as some congressional Republicans doubtless do think it's just fine to fire someone for being gay, but they're notably not running around bragging about it.
So will Ryan and Walden pressure Boehner to allow a House vote on ENDA? Or will they confirm once again that their party has become ever more extremist in recent years?