You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Readers of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, got a surprise in their editorial section--a retraction of an editorial that its predecessor wrote almost 150 years ago. On November 24, 1863, The Patriot & Union, the direct ancestor of the Patriot-News, penned an editorial that panned Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, which had been delivered five days earlier. In that editorial, the Patriot & Union dismissed the speech as "silly remarks" that should disappear into "the well of oblivion." As any semi-educated person knows, that assessment was wrong. Bad wrong.
No mere utterance, then or now, could do justice to the soaring heights of language Mr. Lincoln reached that day. By today’s words alone, we cannot exalt, we cannot hallow, we cannot venerate this sacred text, for a grateful nation long ago came to view those words with reverence, without guidance from this chagrined member of the mainstream media.
The world will little note nor long remember our emendation of this institution’s record – but we must do as conscience demands:
In the editorial about President Abraham Lincoln’s speech delivered Nov. 19, 1863, in Gettysburg, the Patriot & Union failed to recognize its momentous importance, timeless eloquence, and lasting significance. The Patriot-News regrets the error.
Wow. We've come to know The Patriot-News for its yeoman's work in covering the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, but until today I didn't know that this bad miss by the editorial board was its most infamous moment. How egregious was this? Apparently it ranks in journalistic infamy with WaPo's failure to even mention the "I Have a Dream" speech in its coverage of the March on Washington.
Deputy opinion page editor Matthew Zencey describes the retraction as a way to reflect on "what rock heads ran this outfit 150 years ago."
One can only hope that other newspapers have the guts to admit they screwed up at the time. I seem to think of Southern newspapers who vociferously supported Jim Crow and demonized the civil rights movement.