This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

From time to time I like to check the Google to find the latest info on the shadow or underground economy, both in the U.S. and abroad. For some reason, academics in the euro zone seem more interested in this phenomenon than their U.S. counterparts. In Russia the issue is being actively addressed by their central bank to counter bankers converting accounts to cash and then smuggling the money out of the country. Of course, they don't call it smuggling; "dubious financial operations" has a more modern ring.

Modernity seems to be the flavor of the year. A study, (pdf) conducted by one Dr. Friederich Schneider at the University of Linz under the auspices of Visa Europe and A.T. Kearney is also concerned with modernity.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

As his second paragraph explains:

Paradoxically, as consumers achieve this “modernity,” they still rely primarily on old-fashioned cash for most of their transactions. Dirty and heavy, cash is also easy to hide from authorities, fuelling one of society’s most damaging phenomena: the shadow economy—that blurry area of commerce that includes legal activity hidden deliberately from public authorities.
Regardless of the copy right claims at the end of this study, I really have little inclination to quote extensively. Of more interest are the preconceived notions (a phrase I prefer to "prejudice") embedded in just that little paragraph, because it continues the long and apparently valued habit by economists of proceeding from false assumptions.

Let's start with the characterization of cash as "old-fashioned" as if "new" were better and "fashion" were a concept that even applies to currency. That currency, a utilitarian measure of relative value, ought to be standardized and as readily available as the inch is obviously not to be considered. That a "transaction" involves a person acting doesn't seem to register either. If it did, people handing over cash for what they receive in exchange would not come as a surprise.

"Hide from authorities" is, at least, honest and illuminates the sudden preference for "transparency" on the part of public officials. "We're just going to look through what you're doing; no need to be alarmed." That individual privacy is to be respected and that public officials are to be scrutinized simply can't be accepted. What good is authority if people can hide from the all-seeing eye?

So, transactions that can't be easily tracked are now "one of society's most damaging phenomena," as if society and keeping records were one and the same and all of the trade and exchange that developed before writing and reading became ubiquitous counted for naught. Or, perhaps, we are to conclude that human societies are defined by the extent to which symbols supplant what people actually do. I suppose that's the preferred definition for people who do nothing but manipulate symbols from morning to night. That somebody is actually fixing lunch doesn't even register with the virtual crowd.

Who puts the food on the good professor's table? Does he even notice?

In the beginning, economic theory proposed that

"Man prefers leisure and must be bribed to work."

That man's transactions aren't valid unless they can be tracked is not far off the mark. What's still important is that somebody be in charge. Otherwise, who will fix the authorities' lunch?

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.