This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

It's very clear now that the New Jersey closure of traffic lanes for the Washington Bridge was political retribution and not because of some "traffic study". It is also clear that the retribution came from Governor Chris Christie's inner circle and very likely came from the Governor himself. What I'm curious to know is whether what Christie did is a federal crime and whether the Justice Department should be investigating. More after the jump.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

There is a federal statute which makes it a crime to use mail or wire communications in support of a scheme to deprive someone of "honest services". Specifically, 18 USC section 341 makes it a crime to use mail or wire communication in support of

any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.
That section is modified by section 1346 which states that
the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.
This statute was successfully used against NY Senator Joseph Bruno for money and other benefits he received from political donors. In exchange for the goodies he received, Bruno made sure that legislation they sought was passed. That conviction was overturned though when the Supreme Court limited the "honest services" provision to actual bribes and kickbacks. The charges against Bruno were worded more broadly than that. However, the Justice Dept. has been approved to seek a retrial of Bruno on charges limited to bribes and kickbacks.

So, the question for the Justice Department, is whether Chris Christie's reverse kickback, that is, a punishment inflicted on someone who didn't do him a political favor, rather than a reward paid to someone who did, qualifies under the statute. The Joe Bruno case is my only familiarity with this federal law and it would be great if there are some of you more familiar and who might know whether this has been attempted either successfully or otherwise. Oh how I would love to see Chris Christie under federal indictment.

EDIT: There this from Northjersey.com this morning:

Interfering with interstate commerce – and playing God with the GWB is doing just that – warrants a federal criminal investigation. In addition to a federal probe, a state probe is needed. Because New Jersey's attorney general is a Christie pick, New York should take the lead in that investigation. - See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/...
Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.