This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Earlier today, Rudy Giuliani continued the Chris Christie camp's "attack the messenger" meme.  On Meet the Press, Giuliani claimed that New Jersey assemblyman John Wisniewski should pull back from his leadership role in the Bridgegate investigation because he's no longer an impartial investigator.

"David, when you announce before you even investigate it you don't believe the subject of the investigation or the person who is the ultimate focus of the investigation it would seem to me the assemblyman has an ethical obligation to step down, to recuse himself," Giuliani said.  "He is no longer an impartial arbiter of the facts. He has announced he doesn't believe Gov. Christie."

Giuliani said there is yet no evidence on the table that shows Christie is lying about his involvement in the scandal or when he became aware.

"Whether he is or isn't that's what the investigation is for," Giuliani said. "The person conducting the investigation has now announced the conclusion of the investigation - that he believes the governor is not telling the truth.  He should not be handling the investigation, it gives it no sense of credibility and it clearly is a partisan witch hunt."

Watch the whole thing here.

Giuliani went further and claimed that Christie is getting kicked up, down and sideways as part of a coordinated national Democratic effort to derail his presidential hopes.  He further argued that Christie proved he is indeed presidential material with the way he is handling the affair.

Um, Rudy?  You're missing a couple of points.  First, there is nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade.  When you've got so many senior people on Christie's staff emailing back and forth before and during the bridge closures, it's pretty hard to believe nobody told Christie about it.  As Wisniewski has pointed out, this happened two months before the election, so it's hard to believe no one told Christie about it to keep him from being caught flatfooted if someone questioned him.  The second point, related to the first, is that Christie doesn't look very good even if he's telling the truth.  If the first he found out about his staff's involvement was when he saw The Record's story flash across his iPad, then you have a governor with a rogue staff.  Sadly, David Gregory appears to believe Rudy--his first question was "Is this an even-handed approach as an investigation? Or do you think it's a political witch hunt?"

Wisniewski fired back via a statement which pointed out Republicans have praised his approach to the investigation, and joined unanimous votes to let it continue.  For instance, when David Wildstein was held in contempt of Wisniewski's committee, the contempt vote was unanimous--even the Republicans joined in.  That's a BFD, considering the nature of New Jersey politics.  Unlike most other states, a good number of state posts are filled solely by gubernatorial appointment.  Which means that a lot depends on staying in the governor's good graces.  Sounds like New Jersey is one state where GOP politicians know partisanship has its limits.

Give Wisniewski some love on Facebook and on Twitter.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

3:24 PM PT: Since this made the rec list, I thought I'd mention that Gregory didn't even try to press Giuliani on whether Darrell Issa's investigations of the Benghazi deaths were also a witch hunt.  So an investigation based on actual evidence of potential criminal activity is a witch hunt, but an investigation based on rumors is justified?

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.