You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
As has been discussed lately, here and elsewhere, the State of Utah, whether because of turmoil in their Attorney General's office or because they simply aren't up to the task or perhaps a combination of the two, has hired an outside special counsel (or as he's described it, a "Special Assistant Attorney General") to conduct their appeal of the district court's ruling striking down the state amendment which bans marriage equality.
The state's counsel, Gene Schaerr, comes from a high-level DC-based law firm, was a clerk for Chief Justice Warren Burger and has an otherwise fairly impressive record. So it's a bit surprising that he'd go off the deep end by admitting that his motive for taking the on case is that he has (in his own words) a religious and family duty to fulfill. If that doesn't translate to "mission from God" I don't know what does.
I find this sort of statement quite troubling since, the last I checked, the laws of the United States are not supposed to favor one religious viewpoint over another. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints may not wish to solemnize the marriages of same-sex couples, but other religious denominations have no problem with doing so, and most of those individuals who profess no particular religion or who expressly disavow it in general are, in the main, not opposed to legal marriage for gay and lesbian couples. Why should his church's view be the one that gets legal recognition?
At the same time, I'm not sure how he's really serving his client by making it clear to anyone with internet access that his arguments in court will be based not on the words of the US Constitution as interpreted by way of various court rulings, but on the his religious convictions. It's even been suggested by some commenters on Joe My God that such statements as the one he made could actually serve as grounds for debarment on the basis that by being admitted to the bar he has sworn an oath to uphold not his religion but the Constitution. I don't know enough about these matters to be able to tell if those folks are correct but it does make a certain amount of sense on the most obvious of levels.
He noted as well that he has confidence in the "scriptural promise" that "all things work to the good for them that love God." I suppose in that case he won't be terribly upset when he loses in court.
Originally posted to sfbob on Wed Jan 22, 2014 at 04:15 PM PST.