This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Republican presidential candidates former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (L) tries to get Texas Governor Rick Perry to stop talking during Romney's time answering a question during the CNN Western Republican presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, O
GOP thinks less of this will solve its presidential problems
Via Jamie Dupree, the Republican Party is on the verge of adopting a new set of rules aimed at compressing its presidential nomination calendar for 2016:
National Republicans meeting in Washington, D.C. this week are ready to ratify an accelerated primary and caucus selection system for 2016, a move that would give the GOP nominee an extra two months to focus on the general election.

The plan before the Rules Committee of the national GOP would set the Republican National Convention in either late June or early July of 2016, which would be the earliest GOP gathering since 1948.

Under the plan, the GOP nomination battle would also start later than it did in 2012 or 2008—February, instead of January, and even then, outside of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada, no state could hold a binding contest until March. That means almost all primaries and caucus would take place from March to May, shaving two months off the 2012 calendar.

Please read below the fold for more on the GOP's new calendar strategy.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The goal here seems to be to correct the perceived flaws of the GOP's 2012 primary process, including the fact that holding an earlier convention would allow the nominee to start raising general election money earlier in the year. Combined with the GOP's plan to limit primary debates to friendly media outlets like Fox News, a shorter calendar also aims to limit the nation's exposure the clownshow that the Republican presidential nomination has become, especially if there's not a competitive Democratic primary.

But as I wrote last month, I'm skeptical that these sorts of process changes will yield the results party leaders desire. First and foremost, the GOP's problem is that the reason it comes off like a freakshow is that it is a freakshow. Yes, Mitt Romney won the party's nomination, but he only won it after selling his soul to the GOP's right. In the end, that's really what his problem was.

In fact, as damaging as the debates were to the GOP brand in 2012, and as bad as it may have been for them to have a drawn-out nomination process, I don't think it's clear that Romney would have won a short battle with fewer debates. For Romney, the debates were a curse and a blessing: They allowed his rivals to soar, one-by-one, but just as methodically, Romney used the debates to destroy his opponents after they took flight. If there had been fewer debates and a shorter schedule, Romney might not have had the opportunity to dismantle his rivals and the GOP could have ended up with a Rick Perry or Newt Gingrich as its nominee. And as bad a candidate as Romney was, he was still the GOP's best bet.

Ultimately, however, it probably doesn't matter what the GOP does—except insofar as the GOP nomination process really does make for great political theater. If the GOP wants to be competitive in presidential elections, it's going to need to do a lot more than simply change its nomination process. It's going to need to change what it stands for. And there's no sign of that happening.

Extended (Optional)


Your Email has been sent.