This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

As you know by now, a judge in Fort Worth ordered Marlise Munoz removed from life support by Monday morning.  While the hospital has the right to appeal, it made a key concession that, to my non-lawyer's mind, effectively derails any chance of it being successful.  For the first time, hospital officials conceded what Marlise's husband, Erick, has been maintaining for several months--that Marlise is brain dead, and is therefore legally dead under Texas law.

On Friday, John Peter Smith Hospital acknowledged for the first time that Marlise Munoz, who is being kept on a respirator under Texas law, has been brain dead since November 28 and that the "fetus gestating inside Mrs. Munoz is not viable," according to court documents released before a Friday hearing.

The woman's husband has repeatedly made these claims in his efforts to have her removed from the machines so the family can bury her.

Erick Munoz contends doctors told him his wife "had lost all activity in her brain stem" and an accompanying chart stated that she was "brain dead." He has further called her "nothing more than an empty shell" who should be left to rest in peace.

Those concessions were made in a statement of facts agreed to by the Munoz family's legal team and the Tarrant County DA (which argued the case for the hospital since JPS is a public hospital) before today's proceeding.  Read it here.  The Texas Health and Safety Code states in no uncertain terms that if a person has "irreversible cessation of all spontaneous brain function," that person isn't just in a coma--he or she is legally dead.

In making this concession, JPS has, to my mind, tacitly admitted that it knew Marlise was brain dead, and yet kept her on life support anyway.  How grotesque can you get?  By definition, you can't maintain life support on a person who is dead.

According to WFAA-TV in Dallas, the Munoz family's requests ignored the interests of the fetus.  Well, that dog no longer hunts with its concession that it knew Marlise was legally dead.  It simply defies believability that there were no means of making sure that the fetus was viable short of essentially making Marlise's corpse a human incubator.

At least one attorney thinks JPS will appeal.  But unless it can justify how it can maintain life support on a dead woman, the velocity with which that appeal gets tossed will create quite the breeze.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

5:13 PM PT: Several commenters have wondered about who will foot the bill for Marlise's treatment.  Basic decency, as well as the hospital's concession that it knew she was legally dead, ought to suggest that the hospital will eat the bill.  But considering that they let this go for this long, you never really know.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.