This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Jack Mirkinson just reported that the NY Times' Public Editor Criticizes Paper Over Tweaks To Chris Christie Story, which we should report and note here just as quickly as we noted the barrage of breaking negative stories about Governor Chris Christie, over the last month.

The New York Times' public editor sided with critics of the paper who thought that an editor's note should have been attached after changes were made to a crucial story about Chris Christie on Friday.

Margaret Sullivan wrote on Monday that the changes the Times made to its story about accusations against Christie made by one of his former political allies were significant enough to have warranted comment. The paper altered the lede of its story, which initially said that Christie's accuser "had the evidence to prove" that the governor knew about the infamous lane closings on the George Washington Bridge when he said he hadn't known, to say that "evidence exists" that Christie knew.

Although, this error may appear to be small, and was corrected withing 20 minutes, by not including a correction updated notice the NYT provided the Christie campaign the ammunition to divert public and media attention away from the more substantive allegations.  

The NYT metro editor's first response was that no note was attached because it was one of only "dozens" of changes made to the story, and that online stories are constantly evolving.  This explanation raises more questions than it answers.

By Monday, though, the editor, Wendell Jamieson, had changed his tune, as he told Sullivan:

    “I don’t believe there’s a correctible error in that initial lead,” he said. “But should there have been an editor’s note? Perhaps. I regret not suggesting that.”

For her part, Sullivan said that the change should have been addressed:

    My take: This change was more than a nuance. Acknowledging that could have taken the form of a straightforward correction. The change also could have been explained in an editor’s note or could even have been acknowledged in a sentence in the body of the article.

The cause of justice is not served by error or sloppiness in reporting so I believe the New York Times deserves credit for making this correction withing 20 minutes, and I agree with the public editor, Margaret Sullivan, that the changes to the story should have been noted in a "change update" notice as we routinely do here at Daily Kos.

On Friday, I did notice here that one of our top rec'd stories continued to report the first false story for a whole day after the correction and I incorrectly presumed it was sloppiness on the part of our author here, rather than the fact that our author reported and linked to the original story which was apparently changed without his, or her, knowledge. I didn't say anything because I didn't want to "create waves," but I had a sad feeling about our collective integrity.  If the NYT had included an correction update, I may not have incorrectly assumed our author here at Daily Kos was the one who was sloppy, rather than the New York Times.  

Additionally, let's notice that this sloppiness has become one of today's leading headlines and former NY Mayor Rudy Guiliani was just making hay out of on CNN, when one of the bigger lede's of the weekend should be the incredible incompetence shown by Christie's campaign in the rambling and weird attack memo on David Wildstein's high school years, and other trivialities that are well covered in a Salon article. Is it not poignantly ironic, (or should I say ironically poignant?,) that Christie's strategy to demonstrate he is not a bully who abuses power, is to bully and abuse his accuser's character all the way back to what a high school social studies teacher observed? And, criticizing Wildstein for blogging long ago under a pseudonym (I think it was Wally Edge, or something like that.)  

Perhaps, I should take may own advice to heart and finally admit that my real name is not actually Basset Hound, and I'm not a real hounddog, but that should be in a different post.  


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

2:09 PM PT: "Hey, dats a nice reputation ya got there, NYT, what a shame if something were to happen to it."

3:38 PM PT: Thanks for Little for bringing us this link to the original source that I did not include in the original post.

New York Time Public Editor Blog

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.