This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

San Francisco is waging an ongoing war against the homeless. The city is seeking to capitalize on a renewed tech boom, which is adding more jobs and tax revenues to the economy. However, their policies amount to gentrification as they are sweeping the problem of homelessness under the rug without addressing the core causes.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

What to do with the homeless in San Francisco has been an ongoing debate for the last 30 years and has led to massive class conflicts. There have been regular rent protests and protestors picketing the tech buses used to take techies to work for bemoths such as Apple, Google, and Twitter. One person had this to say about the homeless:

Sometimes that has gotten ugly. Last December the then-CEO of tech startup AngelHack, Greg Gopman, posted a Facebook status complaining of the homeless in San Francisco. "The difference is in other cosmopolitan cities, the lower part of society keep to themselves. They sell small trinkets, beg coyly, stay quiet and generally stay out of your way. They realize it’s a privilege to be in the civilized part of town and view themselves as guests. And that’s okay," he wrote.

Gopman’s tirade garnered a flood of hostile media attention. Now he regrets the post, calling it "not well thought out."

"I don’t hate the homeless. I hate that we have turned a blind eye towards finding a real solution, and because of mental illness and despair, many of our streets are not safe," he told Al Jazeera.

Unfortunately, thanks to the city's policy of gentrification, it is not always possible to avoid the homeless. The problem is that there are at least six times as many homeless as there are beds to house them:
But the city suffers from a shortage of homeless facilities. There were close to 6,500 homeless in San Francisco last year, according to official estimates — although homeless advocates say counting the transient population is a difficult task and that the true number could be much more. Yet there are currently only 1,139 beds available in San Francisco’s crowded homeless shelters.
And certain city workers are saying one thing and doing another:
DPW's Gordon noted that the cleaning program, which removes everything from excrement to used needles from the streets, also covers "basic outreach with information on services," but an Al Jazeera reporter did not witness any DPW workers or police offering the homeless direction to shelters or other resources.
One of the main causes of homelessness is the astronomically high rents. The site rent.com lists apartments for rent within 25 miles of San Francisco. As of today's writing, the cheapest apartment is $1,675 per month with the next cheapest at around $1,900 per month. Most are over $2,000 per month. This means that it is difficult to make ends meet for people even with a $20/hour wage (which brings in around $3,200/month assuming 40 hours a week).

The San Francisco Gate has done a whole series on the homeless and notes:

We trip over them on the sidewalk every day. We curse, hand them a dollar, or don't. We feel pity, sorrow, guilt and rage at their presence. The city spends $200 million a year trying to get homeless people off the streets and into a better way of life – and though much progress has been made over the past couple of decades, the problem never goes away.

The more able of the homeless find their way into shelters, counseling and housing programs. But the most chronically indigent, called the hard core, are so entrenched that they are particularly tough to pull up off the street into healthier lives. These 3,000 to 5,000 homeless at the very bottom are the most visible, and they give the city its dubious distinction of having what many call the most visible homeless problem in the country.

The $200 million a year figure is a colossal waste of taxpayer money. That is over $25,000 for each homeless person in the city. It might actually be more cost effective simply to give each homeless person $10,000 -- and let them choose where to spend the money. That would be cheaper and at least more cost effective than what the city is already doing. In one experiment, 13 homeless people in the UK were given $1,277 each, and 11 of them were able to get off the streets. Contrary to popular stereotypes, they did not spend it all on booze and drugs.

This has been a problem 30 years in the making:

Although visible and widespread homelessness emerged unexpectedly in San Francisco in 1982, its causes are not a mystery. Consider some of the events that occurred in the preceding decade:

-- The San Francisco Redevelopment Agency destroyed thousands of low-cost single room occupancy hotels in the South of Market for "urban renewal."

-- The City's Rehabilitation Assistance program (RAP) forced thousands of low-income tenants to leave the upper Haight-Ashbury, initiating a gentrification process that would virtually eliminate privately owned low-cost housing in the neighborhood.

-- The City's Planning Department reported that over 6,000 single room occupancy units were lost from 1975-79, and another 1,700 from 1981-88.

-- Rapidly increasing real estate values led to significant increases in rent citywide and displacement of low-income tenants through neighborhood gentrification.

-- The statewide mental health system steadily declined and board-and-care homes were converted to market-rate homes, rental housing, or condominiums.

-- The federal government responded to these events, which also occurred in similar forms throughout America's major cities, by sharply reducing the availability of subsidized housing. Thus, as the gap between people's incomes and housing costs widened, federal housing policy failed to intervene to prevent rising homelessness.

The article goes on to note that former SF Mayor Dianne Feinstein tried to house them in hotels -- which turned out to actually encourage homelessness because it did not provide long-term solutions.

The National Journal reports on the Hope SF program, which is based on a successful program in Seattle.

Hope SF is a project dedicated to revitalizing low-income areas by rebuilding old housing projects and offering a range of social services to the mostly low-income residents. It is led by the Mayor's Office of Housing and the San Francisco Housing Authority, in collaboration with government, philanthropic, and community partners. The goal is to transform a handful of severely underserved and aging public-housing sites, without forcing out current residents. Potentially, it provides a model to other urban areas, which are looking to revamp public housing while retaining cities' socioeconomic mix of residents.

Public-housing reform is not new, but Hope SF's emphasis on resident-based programs like the walking school bus, in addition to rehabbing old buildings, could lead the effort to succeed in a way other housing projects have not—particularly in a city like San Francisco with its rapidly rising housing costs. The biggest challenge now is convincing residents, who have been so neglected in the past, that this time is different.

The problem is that since the city has let the problem go for the last 30 years, there has been a massive breakdown of trust between the city and its people.
"There is no reason in hell for public-housing residents to trust officials that come in and say they'll make their lives better," says Pam David, former director of the Mayor's Office of Community Development and member of the Steering Committee for the Campaign for Hope SF. "Our history is with most things that have been tried, most were delivered to them, not with them. And they have not worked and not been sustained."
The question is whether the political will exists to keep the program going after the present mayor leaves and a new administration is elected. The present website for the project has not been updated for a year, suggesting that promoting it to the city is not high on the list of the city's priorities.
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Stop the Police State! on Wed Feb 19, 2014 at 11:00 AM PST.

Also republished by Kossacks for the Homeless Person and ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

Your Email has been sent.