You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited the execution of persons with intellectual disability (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002), it has been up to the states to enforce this constitutional protection. But when diagnosing intellectual disability for death penalty cases, shouldn't the standard error or measurement (SEM) inherent in all IQ tests be considered?
Florida doesn't think so. Despite a universal consensus among professional organizations that an IQ test is only one part of diagnosing intellectual disability, and that the SEM present in all IQ tests should be taken into account, the Sunshine State still imposes a rigid IQ score cutoff of 70 in determining intellectual disability in capital cases. That means a person whose obtained IQ test score is 71 can be executed even if he has consistently been diagnosed as having intellectual disability and regardless of how severe his limitations in adaptive functioning may be.
SCOTUS will address the question at the beginning of March in Hall v. Florida. An opinion piece by Atkins expert John Blume, Professor of Law at Cornell University, argues that Floridaâs standard is inconsistent with Atkins v. Virginia and the Constitution:
This is unconscionable. Under accepted clinical standards, Mr. Hall is a person with intellectual disability. His scores on reliable, individualized IQ tests for the most part cluster around 69-74, a range that both the AAIDD and the APA recognize as consistent with intellectual disability. Hall was first determined to be intellectually disabled in elementary school, and he has been diagnosed with intellectual disability by numerous psychiatrists and psychologists who have examined him over the years and he was even found by a Florida state judge to be a person with an intellectual disability prior to Atkins. Stripped down to its essence, the issue in Hall v. Florida, is whether—despite the clear clinical consensus that Hall falls within the class of persons guaranteed exemption from capital punishment by the Supreme Court of the United States—Florida can utilize a strict (and arbitrary) 70 IQ cutoff to deny what is clinically obvious; Hall is intellectually disabled.
Will the Supreme Court affirm what doctors, scientists, and clinicians have agreed upon for years? If the Court truly meant what it ruled in Atkins, one would hope; otherwise, Mr. Hall and others in Florida with intellectual disability may be executed.
Originally posted to jscornejo on Fri Feb 21, 2014 at 10:48 AM PST.